|
|
| mail (score: 0.230) |
|
| | Re: Official and Unofficial theme categories
|
| (...) I think I understand the concepts a bit better from reading other posts on this thread but just to make things clear (in my head) you're looking for something that would use a relationship key (or set designation, or fuzzy catagory) as it's (...) (26 years ago, 8-Jan-99, to lugnet.admin.database)
| |
| internet (score: 0.230) |
|
|
| mail (score: 0.230) |
|
|
| mail (score: 0.229) |
|
| | Lugnet for beginners
|
| Todd, Suz, et al Lugnet can be rather intimidating, IMO, to newcomers due to its massive size and scope. The Pause database aside, the news portion of Lugnet is growing every day by 400 messages or so and can leave new arrivals here with a sense of (...) (25 years ago, 28-Feb-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
| |
| mail (score: 0.229) |
|
|
| mail (score: 0.229) |
|
|
| mail (score: 0.229) |
|
| | Re: Multiple votes for CLSotW possible?
|
| Well I don't know if this helps a bit but this is the hidden source from one of my page's forms: <input TYPE=IMAGE SRC="../../submit.jpg" NAME="E-Mail" ALT="Submit the form!"> <input type=hidden name="recipient" value="fusion@refraxion.com"> <input (...) (25 years ago, 23-Feb-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
| |
| mail (score: 0.229) |
|
| | Re: Multiple votes for CLSotW possible?
|
| (...) Oh, didn't realize there was a question. (I thought you were only making a statement about comments.) No, never got comments as part of the votes, because the mechanism for sending the form by e-mail was to use <FORM METHOD=POST (...) (25 years ago, 22-Feb-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
| |
| mail (score: 0.229) |
|
|
| internet (score: 0.229) |
|
|
| mail (score: 0.229) |
|
| | Cookie Short-Cut
|
| Todd, is there any way to re-obtain the cookie with our posting information besides re-registering? If there were some automated way to do it, it might cut down on your mail and administrative duties. :) (I am sure that would be a good thing) If I (...) (25 years ago, 21-Feb-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
| |
| mail (score: 0.229) |
|
|
| internet (score: 0.229) |
|
|
| internet (score: 0.229) |
|
| | Re: New group suggestion
|
| It seems to me that a new group for hot availability items (good price, unusual offering, etc) is not really necessary. It seems to me that that is the purpose of shopping. Of course a cross post to buy-sell-trade that a particular person is willing (...) (25 years ago, 22-Feb-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
| |
| mail (score: 0.229) |
|
| | Re: New group suggestion
|
| (...) Hmm, the rationale being what? (Not disagreeing, just unclear on the motivation behind it.) To increase (encourage) more FOTW posts? To make FOTW's easier to find? To make FOTW's come and find you (by subscribing to the group via e-mail?) I'm (...) (25 years ago, 21-Feb-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
| |
| mail (score: 0.229) |
|
|
| internet (score: 0.228) |
|
|
| mail (score: 0.228) |
|
| | New group lugnet.admin.council
|
| All, A new group lugnet.admin.council has just been created for the consideration, deliberation, and reconciliation of delicate administrative issues. Examples include: - Terms-of-Use transgressions (for example, gratuitous use of profanity, (...) (25 years ago, 20-Feb-00, to lugnet.announce, lugnet.admin.council)
| |
| mail (score: 0.228) |
|
|
| mail (score: 0.228) |