Subject:
|
Re: Profanity (was Re: Lego(r) Master Maniac designation?)
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.admin.general
|
Date:
|
Fri, 1 Jan 1999 01:26:47 GMT
|
Highlighted:
|
(details)
|
Viewed:
|
699 times
|
| |
![Post a public reply to this message](/news/icon-reply.gif) | |
On Thu, 31 Dec 1998 21:56:47 GMT, lehman@javanet.com (Todd Lehman)
wrote:
> It's a super-gray area, and it'd be nice if everyone could express
> themselves in ways that didn't offend others. Of course, that'll never
> happen 100%, but there certainly are levels of gray, some of which are more
> likely to offend than others. For example, something like, "It really
> pi---- me off that TLG now makes these new 2-piece palm trees," is probably
> likely to offend fewer people than something like, "Those new palm trees
> really are pieces of sh--," which in turn is probably likely to offend fewer
> people than something like, "TLG's designers can go to h---; f--- them for
> even thinking of making 2-piece palm trees."
Not rerally commenting on the thread (I'll keep out of this one for
now), But why don't you just say the words? Do you think F*ck, or
F---, are any less offensive than fuck, the entire word? Juts
something I've noticed on many internet fora. I personallt aren't
offended by either version, but that's just me :)
Jasper
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
16 Messages in This Thread: ![Profanity (was Re: Lego(r) Master Maniac designation?) -Todd Lehman (30-Dec-98 to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.general)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/246.gif) ![Re: Profanity (was Re: Lego(r) Master Maniac designation?) -Jim Baker (31-Dec-98 to lugnet.admin.general)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/246.gif) ![Re: Profanity (was Re: Lego(r) Master Maniac designation?) -Chris Moseley (31-Dec-98 to lugnet.admin.general)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: Profanity (was Re: Lego(r) Master Maniac designation?) -Jim Baker (31-Dec-98 to lugnet.admin.general)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: Profanity (was Re: Lego(r) Master Maniac designation?) -Chris Moseley (31-Dec-98 to lugnet.admin.general)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: Profanity (was Re: Lego(r) Master Maniac designation?) -Jim Baker (1-Jan-99 to lugnet.admin.general)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: Profanity (was Re: Lego(r) Master Maniac designation?) -Chris Moseley (1-Jan-99 to lugnet.admin.general)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: Profanity (was Re: Lego(r) Master Maniac designation?) -Todd Lehman (1-Jan-99 to lugnet.admin.general)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/28.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/68.gif) ![Re: Profanity (was Re: Lego(r) Master Maniac designation?) -Mike Stanley (31-Dec-98 to lugnet.admin.general)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: Profanity (was Re: Lego(r) Master Maniac designation?) -Jim Baker (31-Dec-98 to lugnet.admin.general)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: Profanity (was Re: Lego(r) Master Maniac designation?) -Larry Pieniazek (31-Dec-98 to lugnet.admin.general)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/268.gif) ![Re: Profanity (was Re: Lego(r) Master Maniac designation?) -Stephen Jacquot (31-Dec-98 to lugnet.admin.general)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: Profanity (was Re: Lego(r) Master Maniac designation?) -Todd Lehman (31-Dec-98 to lugnet.admin.general)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/268.gif) ![Re: Profanity (was Re: Lego(r) Master Maniac designation?) -Todd Lehman (31-Dec-98 to lugnet.admin.general)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![You are here](/news/here.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/68.gif) ![Re: Profanity (was Re: Lego(r) Master Maniac designation?) -Terry Keller (1-Jan-99 to lugnet.admin.general)](/news/x.gif)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|