To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.admin.generalOpen lugnet.admin.general in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Administrative / General / 679
678  |  680
Subject: 
Re: Profanity (was Re: Lego(r) Master Maniac designation?)
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.admin.general
Date: 
Thu, 31 Dec 1998 14:52:56 GMT
Reply-To: 
BEAKER@nospamPOBOX.COM
Viewed: 
755 times
  
Also sprach Moz (Chris Moseley):
: For instance, RTL is a venue that allows, even encourages, completely
: free expression. If you can't post within reasonable bounds then perhaps
: RTL is more your cup of tea than LugNet is?

That's the thing, Chris: I believe I do post within reasonable bounds.
My posts are not dripping with profanity; but occasionally I think some
off-color word is the appropriate one and I like having the option.
You've seen me post here and on RTL for a year now, do you think I'm an
idiot who can't express himself without profanity?  Honestly, how many
of my posts in that time have used profanity?  Have you ever seen me use
it in anger towards someone?

My posting behavior is the same here as it is on other newsgroups, no
different.  On other groups my behavior is generally considered to be
modest and self-controlled.  Only here have I had anyone suggest that my
language is innapropriate, and that for something which accounts for
less than 1% of my posts.  I am appalled, frankly.

/ _ _ / _ _         BREAKFAST.COM halted...Cereal Port Not Responding.
()(-(//((-/
============= Jim Baker -- Weather Weasel Extraordinaire ==============



Message has 1 Reply:
  Re: Profanity (was Re: Lego(r) Master Maniac designation?)
 
Beaker wrote in message ... (...) That's not really the issue - you keep saying "like" and "can live without" but at the same time you insistently argue against a ban. Would it mean that much to you to have this area declared a clean zone? The more (...) (26 years ago, 31-Dec-98, to lugnet.admin.general)

Message is in Reply To:
  Re: Profanity (was Re: Lego(r) Master Maniac designation?)
 
Beaker wrote in message ... (...) While I agree with you, I think you're misapplying the principle. We *should* discourage the LCD approach, but with the intention of raising the standard not lowering it. Too much of the internet is already devoted (...) (26 years ago, 31-Dec-98, to lugnet.admin.general)

16 Messages in This Thread:





Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR