|
 | | Re: 4x2ReVu: 6977 Arachnoid Star Base
|
| (...) Hi Paul, The majority of the plates are blue (though there are also some black) and most of the dark grey bricks are sloping. Those black saucer bottom quarters also appeared in the 6198 Sting Ray Stormer. Hey, black saucer TOPS would be kind (...) (25 years ago, 28-Oct-99, to lugnet.space, lugnet.reviews)
| |
|  
crap
(score: 0.152)
|
|
| |
|
crap
(score: 0.152)
|
|
| | Re: Different fonts in webpages
|
| On this past discussion of fonts, I began to wonder... I looked at the page of common MS fonts, and the main font on my webpage is not listed. Its called Papyrus LET, and the other font I use a lot is Comic Sans MS (which is fairly common, I (...) (25 years ago, 28-Oct-99, to lugnet.publish)
| |
|
crap
(score: 0.152)
|
|
| | Re: A few questions on NQC vs. VB
|
| (...) I'd recommend NQC; if you use visual basic, you'll need to go through a lot of communicating-with-the-brick and user-interface crap every time you want to make a program. With NQC, you concentrate on writing your code for the robot, and don't (...) (25 years ago, 26-Oct-99, to lugnet.robotics.rcx)
| |
|
crap
(score: 0.152)
|
|
| |
|
crap
(score: 0.152)
|
|
| | Idea: Boycott the falcon
|
| We should boycott that crap piece of junk that TLG is trying to pass off as a replica of one of the greatest fictional spacecraft of all time. -- Jonathan Wilson wilsonj@xoommail.com (URL) (25 years ago, 23-Oct-99, to lugnet.starwars)
| |
|
crap
(score: 0.152)
|
|
| | Re: Some disturbing news
|
| (...) My first problem is that a vast majority of the service packs you guys talk about aren't available here at all. Our parts catalogue is a disgrace. My second problem is that a vast majority of the tubs and buckets you guys talk about aren't (...) (25 years ago, 27-Oct-99, to lugnet.general)
| |
|
crap
(score: 0.152)
|
|
| | Re: Parts Pack Survey
|
| (...) Well here in Canada we have our own Shop@home for the moment. I purchased about $125 worth of Technic service packs a couple months ago. As some have stated, there are many problems with service packs. Many won't buy them, because they just (...) (25 years ago, 26-Oct-99, to lugnet.general)
| |
|
crap
(score: 0.152)
|
|
| | Re: Some disturbing news
|
| (...) Some, not all. My kids couldn't tell the difference between nintendo or tenelevendo;-) (...) ILYK Today is my son's 10th birthday and he's getting the 8448-- I wouldn't bet against him, though;-) (...) I think TLG knows that kids are (...) (25 years ago, 26-Oct-99, to lugnet.general)
| |
|
crap
(score: 0.152)
|
|
| | Re: BT2 *mostly* bites (Was: Picture of Falcon?)
|
| Sproaticus wrote in message <3814975D.F8DC1ECF@io.com>... (...) Me too, if only for non- (or even just subtly!) patterned saucer pieces. They would be fantastic for making very large radar dishes that didn't make you gag every time you saw them (...) (25 years ago, 26-Oct-99, to lugnet.space)
| |
|
crap
(score: 0.152)
|
|
| | Re: Picture of Falcon?
|
| (...) No builder in the world unaffiliated with TLG, with this much ability, would in his/her right mind ever go to so much trouble to piss off his fellow builders. Why would anyone bother designing a mock-up like this, with just the right amount (...) (25 years ago, 23-Oct-99, to lugnet.starwars)
| |
|
crap
(score: 0.151)
|
|
| | TLG Falcon Figs
|
| Here are the figs it should have. Han Solo C-3P0 Princess Leia Chewbacca Here is what it probobly will have Han Solo (with crap torso) R2-D2 (again) Luke (again) Obi-Wan (just to fill out the set) If ANYONE out there knows what figs are going to be (...) (25 years ago, 22-Oct-99, to lugnet.starwars)
| |
|
crap
(score: 0.151)
|
|
| | Re: SW set list for 2000
|
| (...) I understand your point of view and to some degree sympathize with it. My only consolation is that Lucas trys to make sure it is all consistent with everything else. Paramount on the other hand totally destroyed Star Trek with all that crap (...) (25 years ago, 22-Oct-99, to lugnet.starwars)
| |
|
crap
(score: 0.151)
|
|
| | Re: Line in the Sand
|
| (...) I would. This is WAY better than most of the crap requirements I have to rationalize into some semblance of something to keep paying customers happy. Very nice work, Steve. Written in a way that made it understandable to someone that doesn't (...) (25 years ago, 20-Oct-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
| |
|
crap
(score: 0.151)
|
|
| | Your Local Lego Webmaster!
|
| Hello everyone. First off, I'd like to say that I'm very pleased with everyone's creations. You are all very talented lego-ers. I've been observing this newsgroup for a LOOOOOONG time, looking at everyone's site and creations to make my creations (...) (25 years ago, 22-Oct-99, to lugnet.starwars)
| |
|
crap
(score: 0.151)
|
|
| | Re: Feedback solicitation
|
| (...) That's not how eBay feedback is seen or used. It is almost completely _quantity_-based. You'll see people say, "I don't think someone with such a low number feedback should be making comments like that." Even if the person has 5 purely (...) (25 years ago, 19-Oct-99, to lugnet.market.theory)
| |
|
crap
(score: 0.151)
|
|
| | Re: Lego.com - new look
|
| (...) I am very dissapointed with this site. Your problem is just one of them; you don't have java/javascript enabled in your browser. Of course, if you have WebTV, it doesn't *have* java. It makes *no* allowance for people with disabilities, it (...) (25 years ago, 16-Oct-99, to lugnet.general)
| |
|
crap
(score: 0.151)
|
|
| | Re: What´s new at www.lego.com ?
|
| (...) I will take it from these two posts I'm not the only perso who HATES TLG's web designs? I happen to be running on an old 486 with only 16 megs of ram. Getting Netscrape to load faster than a minute is doing pretty good, but when they start (...) (25 years ago, 16-Oct-99, to lugnet.general)
| |
|
crap
(score: 0.151)
|
|
| | Re: 12 golf balls for $1 delivered
|
| (...) Hrmmm... not sure. I have a lot of crap, if that's what you mean. :) Luckily, I've convinced Rachael we need to move into a 3 bedroom apartment in December (not willing to make a move on a house since I don't know for sure what I'll be doing (...) (25 years ago, 13-Oct-99, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
| |
|
crap
(score: 0.151)
|
|
| |
|
crap
(score: 0.150)
|
