Subject:
|
Re: A few questions on NQC vs. VB
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.robotics.rcx
|
Date:
|
Tue, 26 Oct 1999 17:40:23 GMT
|
Reply-To:
|
mattdm@#stopspam#mattdm.org
|
Viewed:
|
3749 times
|
| |
|
|
Zac Pollock <zpollock@tsieda.com> wrote:
> future. However, I've noticed that NQC seems quite popular and looks fairly
> easy to learn. I know that both languages use the RIS firmware but I don't
> know whether or not NQC offers more control over the code than Vb does. I'd
> prefer to learn the language that will serve me best in my robotic efforts,
> even if I'll never use it anywhere else.
I'd recommend NQC; if you use visual basic, you'll need to go through a lot
of communicating-with-the-brick and user-interface crap every time you want
to make a program. With NQC, you concentrate on writing your code for the
robot, and don't worry about the stuff on the PC.
--
Matthew Miller ---> mattdm@mattdm.org
Quotes 'R' Us ---> http://quotes-r-us.org/
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | A few questions on NQC vs. VB
|
| Hi all. I've been lurking in the shadows reading posts for a couple of weeks and now have a question of my own. I'd like to move beyond the programming capabilities of the RIS software and am trying to decide which way to go. I have VERY little (...) (27 years ago, 26-Oct-99, to lugnet.robotics.rcx)
|
8 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
