|
 | | Re: Fixing the world (was Re: Ldraw cannon
|
| Larry Pieniazek wrote (...) But Larry, the good (selfish) view is that changing tags is fine because you benefit at the expense of people you don't know. Property rights work best when you can persuade others to adhere to them while you don't. (...) (26 years ago, 10-Dec-98, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| |
|  
rights, property
(score: 3.970)
|
|
| |
|
rights, property
(score: 3.969)
|
|
| | Re: Capitalism (was: People are idiots...)
|
| (...) I agree that existence is a property right (and truly the most fundamental one). This does imply a right to a place to exist. However, assuming that the resources of the universe are limited, clearly one doesn't have an unlimited right to (...) (22 years ago, 10-Feb-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| |
|
rights, property
(score: 3.969)
|
|
| | Re: Bad day for individual rights
|
| (...) I don't have an opinion on the second ruling -- it seems OK (without reading the laws in question), but I do disagree with the first. In 1906, in _Hale v. Henkel_, the court wrote: "The individual...owes no such duty [to submit his books and (...) (20 years ago, 21-Jun-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| |
|
rights, property
(score: 3.969)
|
|
| |
|
rights, property
(score: 3.969)
|
|
| | Re: Problems with Darwin's theory
|
| (...) Well, this is an interesting take! Do expound, sounds like fertile ground for discussion, unlike creationism. I would think that property and rights are inventions before I'd think they were myths. ++Lar (24 years ago, 31-Jan-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| |
|
rights, property
(score: 3.969)
|
|
| | Lego copyrights native language
|
| From (URL) could corner Maori names 10 April 2001 By JONATHAN MILNE International toy company Lego could now prevent Maori from marketing toys with Maori names, intellectual property law specialist John Hackett said yesterday. "If a New Zealand (...) (23 years ago, 9-Apr-01, to lugnet.general, lugnet.loc.nz)
| |
|
rights, property
(score: 3.969)
|
|
| | Re: Rolling Blackouts
|
| (...) Explain the tragedy of the commons? Your cite referenced it, I assumed you are familiar with it. (...) Explain the notion that a person engaged in stealing is not a free marketeer? Seems obvious to me. Maybe you're not as familiar with (...) (23 years ago, 26-May-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| |
|
rights, property
(score: 3.968)
|
|
| |
|
rights, property
(score: 3.968)
|
|
| |
|
rights, property
(score: 3.968)
|
|
| | Re: Why TLG doesn't have a leg to stand on anymore.
|
| (...) Copyright laws are pretty the much the same for the reasons you list, with a few exceptions. However, lego cad programs don't infringe on *any* copyrights, only Trademarks and (possibly, but not likely) intelectual property rights. (...) It (...) (25 years ago, 16-Aug-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
| |
|
rights, property
(score: 3.968)
|
|
| | Re: Contributer Agreement Version 3
|
| (...) [snip] (...) Your statement is false. In the United States, copyrights are a form of intellectual property that can be bought and sold like any other form of property. In the United States, once the copyright has been transferred, the original (...) (20 years ago, 22-Jul-04, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
| |
|
rights, property
(score: 3.968)
|
|
| |
|
rights, property
(score: 3.968)
|
|
| | Re: Is space property?
|
| (...) Hi Dave, I get your point, but... The payment of taxes is (normally considered) a proper and right thing. So it feels different (even to me) than being burgled. (How often do you write a check to your burgler?) And, I do know that the (...) (24 years ago, 2-Jan-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| |
|
rights, property
(score: 3.968)
|
|
| |
|
rights, property
(score: 3.968)
|
|
| | Re: Victories for smokefree ballot initiatives
|
| (...) Where? You have no right to breathe ANY air (clean OR dirty) when on my property, unless I grant it. And conversely I have no right to emit smoke on your property, unless you grant it. Therefore when you're on my property, you will breathe the (...) (20 years ago, 10-Nov-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| |
|
rights, property
(score: 3.968)
|
|
| |
|
rights, property
(score: 3.968)
|
|
| | Lego copyrights native language
|
| ----- Original Message ----- From: Trevor Alvey <talvey@gte.net> Newsgroups: lugnet.general,lugnet.loc.nz Sent: Monday, April 09, 2001 10:19 PM Subject: Lego copyrights native language From (URL) Lego could corner Maori names 10 April 2001 By (...) (23 years ago, 10-Apr-01, to lugnet.technic.bionicle)
| |
|
rights, property
(score: 3.968)
|
|
| | Re: New LEGO Toys Based on Jurassic Park III
|
| (...) LEGO could say for sure whether or not it's an invasion of their privacy and/or publicity rights. IANAL, but it seems like it's walking a thin line. Personally, I'd err on the side of not posting here about that level of detail, because then (...) (24 years ago, 6-Feb-01, to lugnet.animation)
| |
|
rights, property
(score: 3.968)
|
|
| | Re: Gotta love Oracle...
|
| (...) Arguably, no. Not on a rights based calculus. But see Friedman (1) who argues that rights based calculus breaks down at the edges (asserting your right not to ingest one molecule of extra CO2 due to a car near but not on your property is a bit (...) (23 years ago, 8-Oct-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| |
|
rights, property
(score: 3.968)
|
