| |
In lugnet.org.ca.nalug, Michel Magnan writes:
> ...The ["standard" LEGO train table] legs are very labor intensive,
> and I still haven't finished the legs from the tables I made last year.
> I believe that the PNLTC guys have eliminated the attachable legs, due
> to the long set up time. If we could somehow use folding legs that would
> save a lot of time, both now and in the future. Steve could you post
> to the IOLTC asking them about their current table standards?
I did so, and John Neal started to reply, but then figured it would
be better to discuss it here so that others could contribute to - and
benefit from - the discussion. OK John - you have the floor... 8-)
SRC
L#765
StRuCtures
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Bridge status and ideas (for GEMTS 2001)
|
| The count is 6 large and 6 small, including the large table with the hole for the round house, and the small table with the trench for the elevator and the sunken small table originally for a small port. Half the tables are still in Edmonton at my (...) (23 years ago, 8-May-01, to lugnet.org.ca.nalug)
|
23 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
