Subject:
|
Re: Bridge status and ideas (for GEMTS 2001)
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.org.ca.nalug
|
Date:
|
Fri, 4 May 2001 00:48:24 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
3057 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.org.ca.nalug, James Brown writes:
> Right now there aren't enough tables, period. We have 6 full
> sets, counting the roundhouse and the blue-topped 30x30.
I seem to recall Michel saying at some point that the table count had
turned out to be inaccurate?? Six full sets as in six 30x60s and six
30x30s? That would mean then that two additional 30x60s (plus
something lower for the mountain/bridge section) would be needed?
SRC
L#765
StRuCtures
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: Bridge status and ideas (for GEMTS 2001)
|
| The count is 6 large and 6 small, including the large table with the hole for the round house, and the small table with the trench for the elevator and the sunken small table originally for a small port. Half the tables are still in Edmonton at my (...) (23 years ago, 8-May-01, to lugnet.org.ca.nalug)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: Bridge status and ideas (for GEMTS 2001)
|
| (...) That calls for a lot of brick, probably more than I have. Verticle lift is what requires the most volume of bricks, if you want it sturdy, and I was fairly well tapped out with the Supertrain mountain at about 2 feet of lift. I've got some (...) (23 years ago, 2-May-01, to lugnet.org.ca.nalug)
|
23 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
