To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.castleOpen lugnet.castle in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Castle / 15871
15870  |  15872
Subject: 
Re: Who is bad in Castle Lego ?
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.castle
Date: 
Mon, 3 Feb 2003 22:35:06 GMT
Viewed: 
495 times
  
In lugnet.castle, Yaron Dori writes:
1996-1998 Forestmen (Good) vs Fright Knights (Bad)
Yes - set 6087 supports this, but also:
Fright Knights (Bad) vs Royal Knights (Good) in set 6097
and:
Fright Knights (Bad) vs some other generic knightly fellow that I can't
place (presumably Good) in set 6047/6099

Cheers

Richie



Message has 1 Reply:
  Re: Who is bad in Castle Lego ?
 
(...) That knight also belongs to the Royal Knights (the same one from 6090). Love LEGO Levo Castle Yaron "Webrain" Dori (21 years ago, 4-Feb-03, to lugnet.castle)

Message is in Reply To:
  Re: Who is bad in Castle Lego ?
 
(...) Hi Michael, 2 things: 1. Check this discussion on the matter from the previous time some1 ask that question: (URL) The way I use to look at it (no one have to agree of course): 1984-1987 Crusders (Good) vs Black Falcons (Bad) 1988-1991 Robin (...) (21 years ago, 3-Feb-03, to lugnet.castle)

15 Messages in This Thread:






Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR