 | | | | | |
In lugnet.castle, Yaron Dori writes:
> 1996-1998 Forestmen (Good) vs Fright Knights (Bad)
Yes - set 6087 supports this, but also:
Fright Knights (Bad) vs Royal Knights (Good) in set 6097
and:
Fright Knights (Bad) vs some other generic knightly fellow that I can't
place (presumably Good) in set 6047/6099
Cheers
Richie
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
In lugnet.castle, Richie Dulin writes:
> In lugnet.castle, Yaron Dori writes:
> > 1996-1998 Forestmen (Good) vs Fright Knights (Bad)
> Yes - set 6087 supports this, but also:
> Fright Knights (Bad) vs Royal Knights (Good) in set 6097
> and:
> Fright Knights (Bad) vs some other generic knightly fellow that I can't
> place (presumably Good) in set 6047/6099
That knight also belongs to the Royal Knights (the same one from 6090).
Love LEGO Levo Castle
Yaron "Webrain" Dori
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
> > Yes - set 6087 supports this, but also:
> > Fright Knights (Bad) vs Royal Knights (Good) in set 6097
> > and:
> > Fright Knights (Bad) vs some other generic knightly fellow that I can't
> > place (presumably Good) in set 6047/6099
> That knight also belongs to the Royal Knights (the same one from 6090).
I guess that's why they call the set 6099, "Traitor Transport", because
the Royal Knight has changed allegiences and joined his enemy (the Fright
(k)Nights)in fine "benedict arnold" style. :)
Ben
| | | | | | |
