| |
In lugnet.trains.org, Mike Walsh wrote:
| |
Why would you want to do this? Honestly, I’d prefer to keep the one we have
AND get the new version of the SCLTC container.
|
Mike -
The ostensible reason is that it’s easier to keep track of everything if we do a
direct swap (we failed to keep good track of the original bunch). The real
reason is that a few of us in the club don’t really like the look of the old
container. So I whipped out Adobe Illustrator and created a label design which
felt more appropriate.
Larry -
| |
MichLUG/LTC records indicate we have no SCLTC cars. :-)
|
Ack! Technicalities...
| |
We do, however, have an SCLTC container, which we’d prefer to keep if
possible. We would be happy to trade with you for your new one though. (as it
turns out, the MichLTC container went through some slight revisions, not
enough to justify a complete trade, but if you traded with us, you’d have two
different ones.
|
I’d prefer to swap simply so we could have the old one back. But I guess it’ll
be something to talk about once we’re all in DC.
We have containers from the following clubs (complete list):
. Melbourne LTC
. PNLTC
. Low Country LTC
. WAMALUG
. Vancouver LTC
. NELUG
. NCLTC
. Bay Area LTC
. GFLTC
. NALUG
. FGLTC
. Michigan LTC
. NGLTC
We are bringing them all with us to BrickFest, in case anyone wants to swap out
their containers with us.
- Thomas Michon
Webmaster, SCLTC
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
Message is in Reply To:
37 Messages in This Thread:
  
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
