Subject:
|
Re: Latest catalog information
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.trains
|
Date:
|
Mon, 19 Feb 2001 04:12:57 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1363 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.trains, James Trobaugh writes:
>
> I don't know if I'd say underpowered, but more like "cost efficient" in the
> engine department.
No, that particular pic does seem to be unpowered, that is, has no motor.
Maybe one of the variants will be a push train version? I'm speculating
because I honestly don't remember what I saw in that regard.
++Lar
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: Latest catalog information
|
| (...) I figured that was what "cost effecient" meant. It seems that Lego assumes that everyone has 4561, so we don't NEED more motors. Whatever this build-your-own thing is, without an included motor (or with a motor being only optional) it should (...) (23 years ago, 19-Feb-01, to lugnet.trains)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: Latest catalog information
|
| I don't know if I'd say underpowered, but more like "cost efficient" in the engine department. -- James J. Trobaugh North Georgia LEGO Train Club (URL) Walsh <mike_walsh@mindspring.com> wrote in message news:G8zDCM.DpG@lugnet.com... <snip> (...) (23 years ago, 19-Feb-01, to lugnet.trains)
|
29 Messages in This Thread:
 
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
