| |
In lugnet.org.ca.nalug, Steve Chapple writes:
> In lugnet.org.ca.nalug, James Brown writes:
> > Hmm. I don't think we can pull off a 15 footer, quite.
> > Quick question: How *wide* are our tables?
>
> Two feet by eight feet (or 6 or 4, but what point is a 2'x4' table?)
>
> > One way of getting a switching yard with fairly close parallel tracks
> > is in one of the layout ideas I had...
>
> For the track designer impaired, here's what he's talking about...
> http://www.brickshelf.com/cgi-bin/gallery.cgi?i=26098
> It's nice, but it still doesn't get the tracks any closer together
> than the standard switch width. Nice and organized though. :-)
?
Why do you want the spurs so close together? If there's one thing we
*aren't* short of, it's space. Stick with the geometry. Even a
space-eating ladder-style yard works just fine.
James
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
Message is in Reply To:
91 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
