Subject:
|
Re: SuperTrain 2001 layout
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.org.ca.nalug
|
Date:
|
Fri, 5 Jan 2001 20:18:17 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
2012 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.org.ca.nalug, Steve Chapple writes:
> In lugnet.org.ca.nalug, John Koob writes:
> > That's a large layout, compared to what we've had before.
> > The large yard looks good too.
>
> I've got some improvements to make - I'll post a new one soon.
OK - Here's the latest. I don't think the play area will be that
large, but you get the idea. I was origianlly thinking of a three-sided
layout facing the play area, but it leaves a huge empty area behind
the layout. If I reverse/mirror everything, then the layout becomes
a sort of court-yard to partly surround the play area. I don't know
what the Calgary organizers will think of this, (that's the main reason
I'm posting this) but they said there was no shortage of space, so...
http://www.brickshelf.com/cgi-bin/gallery.cgi?i=26047
SRC
StRuCtures
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: SuperTrain 2001 layout
|
| (...) the layout to be. Also, if we're about equi-distant from our layout and the play area, we may get involuntarily co-opted into some aspect of play area duty. I think I'd prefer the original horseshoe idea you were working with, backed against (...) (24 years ago, 5-Jan-01, to lugnet.org.ca.nalug)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: SuperTrain 2001 layout
|
| (...) I've got some improvements to make - I'll post a new one soon. (...) The incline is for the bridge to "cross-over the cross-over". Vertically, there are three tracks in one place. Part of my inpiration was a great 4.5V blue layout that I have (...) (24 years ago, 3-Jan-01, to lugnet.org.ca.nalug)
|
91 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
