Subject:
|
Re: SuperTrain 2001 layout - Mountain
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.org.ca.nalug
|
Date:
|
Mon, 15 Jan 2001 20:16:27 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
2795 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.org.ca.nalug, Steve Chapple writes:
> I was trying some layouts in my head yesterday after our Saturday
> get together and realized two problems with the mountain as it stands.
<snip problems>
Yup, we'll have to figure something out - but this and other details have to
wait for the big question to get answered:
Do we have a 'closed-loop' layout, or an 'open C' layout?
That tells us if we need 3 tracks (Michel's rough draft - my preference) or
4 tracks going around (pretty much necessary for 2 loops on an open C).
Until we know one way or the other, everything else is just speculation and
brainstorming.
James
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: SuperTrain 2001 layout - Mountain layout
|
| (...) Well, we're still working on that - this is what I got an hour ago: " It's up to you, you can be either 40 x 20 foot, or 75 x 20ish. With the 40 x 20 foot, it would be easier to keep you near the kid's play area though. " I wrote back that the (...) (24 years ago, 16-Jan-01, to lugnet.org.ca.nalug)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: SuperTrain 2001 layout - Mountain
|
| I was trying some layouts in my head yesterday after our Saturday get together and realized two problems with the mountain as it stands. (URL) (The cross tracks represent the bridge.) Number the tracks 1,2,3,4 from top to bottom. As of Sat. we had 1 (...) (24 years ago, 15-Jan-01, to lugnet.org.ca.nalug)
|
91 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
