Subject:
|
Re: SuperTrain 2001 layout
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.org.ca.nalug
|
Date:
|
Thu, 4 Jan 2001 04:28:33 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
2141 times
|
| |
|
|
James Brown wrote in message ...
> In lugnet.org.ca.nalug, Steve Chapple writes:
> > In lugnet.org.ca.nalug, John Koob writes:
> We can incorperate a line going along a mountain ridge without much
> difficulty.
Great.
> I'd prefer to beg off the elevation changes inside the
> mountain. (derails...*shudder*)
I was thinking of a mountain with an open back, but
if it's enclosed, you're right.
> BTW, John - do you still have a NALUG sign built?
Yup. Don't have a need to rip it apart anytime soon.
It's all white and red bricks--two colors which I hardly
ever use in Technic...
--
John
(remove the obvious to reply)
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: SuperTrain 2001 layout
|
| (...) How long can you make the mountain? Could you make three or four three foot sections (that would connect to each other)? The tunnels not curving won't matter if the tunnels are long enough, especially with them being so far from where someone (...) (24 years ago, 4-Jan-01, to lugnet.org.ca.nalug)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: SuperTrain 2001 layout
|
| (...) We can incorperate a line going along a mountain ridge without much difficulty. I'd prefer to beg off the elevation changes inside the mountain. (derails...*shudder*) BTW, John - do you still have a NALUG sign built? James (24 years ago, 3-Jan-01, to lugnet.org.ca.nalug)
|
91 Messages in This Thread:
  
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
