Subject:
|
Re: My EMD SD40-2
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.trains, lugnet.build
|
Date:
|
Sat, 26 Feb 2000 02:00:10 GMT
|
Reply-To:
|
CMASI@CMASIstopspammers.CHEM.TULANE.EDU
|
Viewed:
|
1506 times
|
| |
|
|
Gee, when you said Studs Not On Top I thought your were refering to a building style;
using bricks in a way that their studs are not on top where they should be. For
example mounting bricks sideways so the studs are hidden or point out instead of up.
Chris
Sproaticus wrote:
> Larry Pieniazek wrote:
> > Sproaticus wrote:
> > > SNOT = *S*tuds *N*ot *O*n *T*op. Basically any bracket or headlight piece, or
> > > any other piece which has studs going in more than one direction, but not
> > > necessarily a hinge or Technic piece.
> > > I live and build by these, man. Makes modelling a lot more fun. :-,
> > I think that SNOT is a malformed acronym then... We have been using
> > derogatory acronyms to exemplify parts that we dislike because they
> > aren't true to the spirit of Lego.
>
> Who says the word snot is bad? Just watch Earthworm Jim! :-,
>
> Some of the maligned parts, such as BURPs, have found some very good uses as
> well. But they still keep the derogatory name. A piece is only useless or
> overspecialized until someone finds a good and unprecedented use for it.
>
> > Now, I would say a part like the 1x1 with side stud, or a part like the
> > 1x4/1x2 bracket is NOT a bad part. It is instead, a GREAT part that
> > enables creations we otherwise could not do. So calling it a SNOT is not
> > fair, I think.
>
> Well, I personally have no issues with calling these pieces SNOTs. (And I
> love 'em.) ...And I do tend to get pretty snotty (snooty?) about my models.
> ;-)
>
> But if someone comes up with a better acronym, I'm willing to change my ways.
>
> Cheers,
> - jsproat
>
> --
> Jeremy H. Sproat <jsproat@io.com> ~~~ http://www.io.com/~jsproat/
> Card-carrying member of the Star-Bellied Sneech Preservation Society
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: My EMD SD40-2
|
| (...) Ya know, I never thought of it (the acronym) that way, but that's a very decent angle (1) as well -- and very closely related to SNOTs as pieces, to boot. Perhaps a better acronym would indicate an aversion to stud-oriented thinking, or an (...) (25 years ago, 26-Feb-00, to lugnet.trains, lugnet.build)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: My EMD SD40-2
|
| (...) Who says the word snot is bad? Just watch Earthworm Jim! :-, Some of the maligned parts, such as BURPs, have found some very good uses as well. But they still keep the derogatory name. A piece is only useless or overspecialized until someone (...) (25 years ago, 25-Feb-00, to lugnet.trains, lugnet.build)
|
22 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
