Subject:
|
Re: LL Trains (was Re:8 wide and bigger(was Re: 8 Wide)
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.trains
|
Date:
|
Tue, 25 Jan 2000 00:07:26 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1292 times
|
| |
|
|
On Mon, 24 Jan 2000, Jonathan Reynolds (<Fov6A8.HIq@lugnet.com>) wrote
at 23:51:44
>
> Ps- Based on a track gauge of 4 studs (it's actually slightly wider of course)
> the proportions of UK prototypes would require a train about 7 and a half
> studs wide.
...And a bit wider is eight studs :-) I'm *definitely* going to try
this soon.
--
Tony Priestman
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: LL Trains (was Re:8 wide and bigger(was Re: 8 Wide)
|
| (...) wide (...) are (...) I checked out the smaller (UK) prototype train models at LL Windsor - they are 18 studs wide and were a job to count whilst the trains were on the move. This translates to 144mm wide - about right for an 8'6" to 9' wide (...) (24 years ago, 24-Jan-00, to lugnet.trains)
|
32 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
