To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.trainsOpen lugnet.trains in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Trains / 3683
3682  |  3684
Subject: 
8 wide and bigger (was Re: 8 Wide)
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.trains
Date: 
Wed, 19 Jan 2000 21:21:15 GMT
Viewed: 
814 times
  
John2,

You may not need to get a couple of million bricks for your 8 wide layout.
You can just use mine.  It will be built to allow 8 wide trains to run.  I
fixed the problems with the turns being too sharp and am going to next fix
the track point geometry.  Only real problem I am running into now is that
with the trains 1.3 times as long and 1.3 times as wide and 1.3 times as
tall, I need 69% more floor space for the same layout and 2.2 times as many
bricks.  But at least it is cooler!

Now I don't want you to switch over to 10 wide just because you have some
fascination with having the biggest trains or I will have to go Legoland
scale on you.

On a side note, has anybody ever tried to build a Legoland scale train.  I
believe that they are 16 studs, but I may be mistaken.  I would love to go
there and bring a home made train body that looks better than their stuff.
Perhaps a large steam loco would do the job.  The moving parts would really
be cool looking.

Mike Poindexter

PS:  Perhaps we should rename John2 to John8 to avoid confusion over who is
who in this ongoing debate.

John Neal <johnneal@uswest.net> wrote in message
news:3885FFB1.EF5D2A99@uswest.net...


John Gerlach wrote:

In lugnet.trains, John Neal writes:
<snip>

Welcome to the "Dark Side [1]"

-John

[1] In reality, the correct side;-)


Pay no attention to the man behind the curtain...  -grin-

For those of you who don't know what we're talking about, John Neal (aka
"John2") thinks that all LEGO trains should be built 8 studs wide.  The
civilized world thinks they should be built 6 studs wide.  So, we have • this
running argument going on!

But, even though we (the GMLTC) think John2 is *wrong*, we still like • him...

But you have to admit that they look great (8 wides) compared to toyish 6
wides.  I like the analogy of comparing 6 wides to Lionel trains.  They • just
don't look right.  And although 8 wides look "LEGO goofy" compared to • model
trains, they at least have potential.  If TLC would create proper trucks, • driver
wheels, window shapes, non-magnetic couplers, larger turns, scale railings
<takes a breath>, etc, we would have a full-blown hobby going here.  We • already
do now, but, like I said, it's a Lionel-type hobby.  The possibilities are • so
vast-- I could see the TRAINS theme become more popular than all the other
*combined*, including SW.  That's my vision.  But it has to be 8 wide (at
least;)

Now, if you'll excuse me, I must go work on my letter to Mr. Justus...

-John


And I keep saying, once he gets a couple of million bricks, we'll build • him a
layout suitable for 8 wide trains!  Any time now, John...  ;-)

Drat, I forgot to play again;-) [1]


[1] The lottery, which, in fact, I never play.



John1, GMLTC
  (remove the '.nospam' to reply...)




Message has 3 Replies:
  Re: 8 wide and bigger (was Re: 8 Wide)
 
(...) Would a simple solution to the turn problem be to just double up on magnets? (stick an extra magnet or two between the cars). KL (24 years ago, 19-Jan-00, to lugnet.trains)
  Re: 8 wide and bigger (was Re: 8 Wide)
 
(...) Mine is 8 wide compatible, too. Would be fun to get them together:-) (...) I'm guessing that mine is the "coolest" [1] (...) LOL No, I don't have any Freudian desire to have the biggest on the block BUT.... I figure that 10 is roughly (...) (24 years ago, 19-Jan-00, to lugnet.trains)
  LL Trains (was Re:8 wide and bigger(was Re: 8 Wide)
 
Mike, et al- I have begun construction of a 14 wide box car [1] and am suddenly very interested in the scale of the LL trains. Does anyone know how many studs wide those babies are? I am looking for some good pics on line, but can't seem to find (...) (24 years ago, 24-Jan-00, to lugnet.trains)

Message is in Reply To:
  Re: 8 Wide
 
(...) But you have to admit that they look great (8 wides) compared to toyish 6 wides. I like the analogy of comparing 6 wides to Lionel trains. They just don't look right. And although 8 wides look "LEGO goofy" compared to model trains, they at (...) (24 years ago, 19-Jan-00, to lugnet.trains)

32 Messages in This Thread:










Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR