Subject:
|
Re: What if.....
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.trains
|
Date:
|
Thu, 10 Mar 2005 22:04:29 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
2076 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.trains, Mark Bellis wrote:
> In lugnet.trains, Larry Pieniazek wrote:
> > I suggest 5 for the width (hey, half stud offset!), in case someone is
> > swivelingright up to the edge and is using this inside an 8 or larger wide
> > creation.
>
> How will you get the bogie plate to rotate adequately though? Perhaps 7-wide
> would be better.
Wouldn't use one. Would use the 2x2 tile with technic pin instead.
>
> To solve the 1-wide-plates-along-the-outside-problem, make it 8-wide!
Bzzt, wrong answer. We're talking about a part that we want LEGO to make. It
needs to fit in with their current parts and be useful to what they do. They do
6 wide.
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: What if.....
|
| (...) Larry brings up a good point. When you think about a "Dream" part you have to look at how it would benifit the TLC. I think the 6x12 train plate has the potential to elliminate the need for the 6x24 and 6x28 train plates. Aslo from a (...) (20 years ago, 10-Mar-05, to lugnet.trains)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: What if.....
|
| (...) How will you get the bogie plate to rotate adequately though? Perhaps 7-wide would be better. To solve the 1-wide-plates-along-...e-problem, make it 8-wide! On second thoughts, that wouldn't work for locos with a thin stripe of one colour at (...) (20 years ago, 10-Mar-05, to lugnet.trains)
|
22 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
