Subject:
|
What if.....
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.trains
|
Date:
|
Mon, 7 Mar 2005 21:15:59 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1365 times
|
| |
|
|
Hello all
I have this idea for a what if part. Its a 6x12 train base plate. I think it
would have some advantages over the standard 6x24 and 6x28 base plates. First
off, it would alow people to make longer trains by not limiting you to the
current train plates. For you 8 widers out there, it would alow for a stronger
connection for trucks.
I would really like some feed back on this.
http://www.mocpages.com/moc.php/8215
So if you got the time head on over to my MOC's page. It has a nice picture of
the part, and a copy of the .DAT file.
Thanks
Dave
www.GPLR.org
|
|
Message has 6 Replies:
 | | Re: What if.....
|
| (...) I think this is certainly an interesting idea, but I don't follow this specific point. I think that although the current bases have their limits, they're easy enough to work around as far as lengths go. I think a good articulation is more (...) (19 years ago, 7-Mar-05, to lugnet.trains)
| | | Re: What if.....
|
| (...) I find with building long wagons in 8mm:1ft scale (8+ wide British or 10+ wide American) that the 6-wide baseplates don't allow a bogie plate to turn sufficiently inside the underneath of the baseplate. Therefore I've used 2x2 plates with a (...) (19 years ago, 7-Mar-05, to lugnet.trains)
| | | Re: What if.....
|
| (...) As an 8-wider, I am left feeling a bit flat. One of the biggest problems using 6-wide bases on 8-wide trains is the number of 1x(x) plates that are needed to fill in the gap, and the minimum thickness of the train's bases grows from 2 to 3 (...) (19 years ago, 8-Mar-05, to lugnet.trains)
| | | Re: What if.....
|
| (...) Very intersting idea! I am not myself a fan of skirted trucks, I like the built up effect you get by using plates and technic plates. But for some applications they make a lot of sense, and I think your one end part might be very useful. To (...) (19 years ago, 8-Mar-05, to lugnet.trains)
| | | Re: What if.....
|
| A very interesting idea, it takes the advantages of the train bases (strength with with the height saving of the inset bogie (truck)) but with far more flexibility of use. I think Lar's suggestion of leaving off one end and adding more holes would (...) (19 years ago, 8-Mar-05, to lugnet.trains)
| | | Re: What if.....
|
| (...) I find that once you go to 8 wide you pretty much have to custom build your base plates using crossed technic plates to form the holes for bogie plates. Building around existing train baseplates makes the base too thick. IMHO MIke (...) (19 years ago, 10-Mar-05, to lugnet.trains)
|
22 Messages in This Thread:
  
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
