Subject:
|
Re: What if.....
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.trains
|
Date:
|
Tue, 8 Mar 2005 01:48:37 GMT
|
Reply-To:
|
cjmasi@*nogarbagepleaseSPAMCAKE*rcn.com
|
Viewed:
|
1731 times
|
| |
|
|
David VinZant wrote:
> Hello all
>
> I have this idea for a what if part. Its a 6x12 train base plate. I think it
> would have some advantages over the standard 6x24 and 6x28 base plates. First
> off, it would alow people to make longer trains by not limiting you to the
> current train plates. For you 8 widers out there, it would alow for a stronger
> connection for trucks.
>
> I would really like some feed back on this.
>
> http://www.mocpages.com/moc.php/8215
>
> So if you got the time head on over to my MOC's page. It has a nice picture of
> the part, and a copy of the .DAT file.
>
>
> Thanks
>
> Dave
>
> www.GPLR.org
As an 8-wider, I am left feeling a bit flat. One of the biggest problems
using 6-wide bases on 8-wide trains is the number of 1x(x) plates that
are needed to fill in the gap, and the minimum thickness of the train's
bases grows from 2 to 3 plates thick.
Just some food coming back :)
Chris
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | What if.....
|
| Hello all I have this idea for a what if part. Its a 6x12 train base plate. I think it would have some advantages over the standard 6x24 and 6x28 base plates. First off, it would alow people to make longer trains by not limiting you to the current (...) (20 years ago, 7-Mar-05, to lugnet.trains)
|
22 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
