To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.trainsOpen lugnet.trains in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Trains / 22939
22938  |  22940
Subject: 
Re: Moonbase: Nailing down Moonway and Rail Standard
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.space, lugnet.trains
Date: 
Tue, 18 May 2004 16:29:31 GMT
Viewed: 
383 times
  
In lugnet.space, Jason S. Mantor wrote:
You got me thinking and, they *can* work alongside each other : )

That's not quite what I meant.  I was saying that you can't have a single line
of track that has sections that follow the current official layout standard and
other sections that follow the proposed idea of riding down the seams between
baseplates.  Not without modified track, at least.  Monorail can be held to
strict Moonbase standards in one section, and then be offset to fit in the gap
between modules in another, which can be very useful when you have a large
number of modules that are not monorail compatible.



Message is in Reply To:
  Re: Moonbase: Nailing down Moonway and Rail Standard
 
You got me thinking and, they *can* work alongside each other : ) Check it out : (URL) just to prove that I really spend way too much time in front of a computer screen, I made some low polygon, mockup, moonbase elements in MLcad to try out ideas (...) (21 years ago, 18-May-04, to lugnet.space, lugnet.trains)

18 Messages in This Thread:





Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR