Subject:
|
Re: Moonbase: Nailing down Moonway and Rail Standard
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.space, lugnet.trains
|
Date:
|
Mon, 17 May 2004 23:36:48 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
382 times
|
| |
![Post a public reply to this message](/news/icon-reply.gif) | |
In lugnet.space, Jason S. Mantor wrote:
> I beleive that this idea maximizes the real estate available...
The advantage to that design is that the area between modules should already
have 8-stud/9-brick clearance, so as long as the train isn't too high, it should
be able to pass through safely without any major modifications to existing
modules. The advantage to the path detailed with the official Moonbase standard
is that it can run adjacent to a module, rather than below it, allowing for
cargo to be offloaded into a warehouse, or attached to a standard Moonbase
corridor. Unfortunately, since the straights are 16-studs long instead of
8-studs, you can't do both with unmodified track.
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
Message is in Reply To:
18 Messages in This Thread: ![Moonbase: Nailing down Moonway and Rail Standard -Jon Palmer (10-May-04 to lugnet.space, lugnet.trains)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/246.gif) ![Re: Moonbase: Nailing down Moonway and Rail Standard -Markham Carroll (12-Apr-04 to lugnet.space, lugnet.trains)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/268.gif) ![Re: Moonbase: Nailing down Moonway and Rail Standard -Christian Treczoks (10-May-04 to lugnet.space, lugnet.trains)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: Moonbase: Nailing down Moonway and Rail Standard -Jon Palmer (10-May-04 to lugnet.space, lugnet.trains)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: Moonbase: Nailing down Moonway and Rail Standard -Christian Treczoks (10-May-04 to lugnet.space, lugnet.trains)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/268.gif) ![Re: Moonbase: Nailing down Moonway and Rail Standard -Jon Palmer (10-May-04 to lugnet.space, lugnet.trains)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/68.gif) ![Re: Moonbase: Nailing down Moonway and Rail Standard -Leonard Hoffman (10-May-04 to lugnet.space, lugnet.trains)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: Moonbase: Nailing down Moonway and Rail Standard -Mark Bellis (10-May-04 to lugnet.space, lugnet.trains)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/246.gif) ![Re: Moonbase: Nailing down Moonway and Rail Standard -Leonard Hoffman (10-May-04 to lugnet.space, lugnet.trains)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: Moonbase: Nailing down Moonway and Rail Standard -Jason S. Mantor (15-May-04 to lugnet.space, lugnet.trains)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![You are here](/news/here.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: Moonbase: Nailing down Moonway and Rail Standard -Jason S. Mantor (18-May-04 to lugnet.space, lugnet.trains)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: Moonbase: Nailing down Moonway and Rail Standard -David Laswell (18-May-04 to lugnet.space, lugnet.trains)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/68.gif) ![Re: Moonbase: Nailing down Moonway and Rail Standard -David Laswell (11-May-04 to lugnet.space, lugnet.trains)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: Moonbase: Nailing down Moonway and Rail Standard -Jon Palmer (11-May-04 to lugnet.space, lugnet.trains)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: Moonbase: Nailing down Moonway and Rail Standard -David Laswell (12-May-04 to lugnet.space, lugnet.trains)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: Moonbase: Nailing down Moonway and Rail Standard -Mike Walsh (13-May-04 to lugnet.space, lugnet.trains)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: Moonbase: Nailing down Moonway and Rail Standard -David Laswell (18-May-04 to lugnet.space, lugnet.trains)](/news/x.gif)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|