Subject:
|
Re: Moonbase: Starting to put up the rail standard
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.space, lugnet.trains
|
Date:
|
Tue, 16 Sep 2003 16:53:28 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
324 times
|
| |
| |
"Xanthra47" <jmantor@nycap.rr.com> wrote in message
news:HLBF8K.800@lugnet.com...
> Yeah. I'll retract those two rules. They are too limiting. I tried to
> build a sample train/corridor model and it just doesn't fit : (
> I think if we're going to do trains we need to revisit the corridor
> height/setback again. Even the new 10 brick height spec isn't enough
> for a metroliner-ish train to clear : ( I think we need 12 bricks high
> and 6 studs of setback. That'd let us run 8 or 10 wide trains between
> modules with no problems. Check out this pic to see what I mean.
>
> http://www.brickshelf.com/gallery/xanthra47/moonbase/traincar.jpg
Now that I disagree with. I don't think the standard should bend because we
need tall trains. Just make em short. Like Larry said, even some mining
carts are only 48" tall.
--
[ j o n ]
http://zemi.net
|
|
Message has 3 Replies:
Message is in Reply To:
25 Messages in This Thread:
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|