Subject:
|
Re: Steam power (was: something else...)
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.trains
|
Date:
|
Thu, 1 Nov 2001 16:09:19 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
887 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.trains, John Gerlach writes:
> In lugnet.trains, Larry Pieniazek writes:
> > Got a detail wrong but the argument stands. Arguing thermodynamics may be
> > off topic for .trains so feel free to redirect or ask for redirection.
>
> Since I'm quite sure you are arguing (Larry? Argue??) temperatures that are
> well above the range that LEGO trains run, I'd suggest .off-topic.geek...
lol good point, J-1-- getting a little too esoteric for we simple folk;-)
J-2
>
> JohnG, GMLTC
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: Steam power (was: something else...)
|
| (...) Whilst we are getting all esoteric about steam engines, I was reminded of a presentation I saw a week so ago which partly covered Brunel's “Atmospheric Railway”. Basically, IKB tried to built a steam powered railway without a “locomotive”… and (...) (22 years ago, 14-Mar-02, to lugnet.trains)
|
Message is in Reply To:
34 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
