To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.trainsOpen lugnet.trains in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Trains / 13781
13780  |  13782
Subject: 
Re: Gray VS. Black Metroliner Nose
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.trains
Date: 
Thu, 1 Nov 2001 14:42:15 GMT
Viewed: 
932 times
  
In lugnet.trains, Larry Pieniazek writes:
Your
theoretical maximum efficiency is upper bound by this ratio

(operating - ambient)/ambient

if I am remembering right.

I'm not, since that can lead to ratios greater than one which is wrong. It's

(operating - ambient)/operating

which means run in colder climates (absolute zero is ideal if you can find
it... hence heat engines can be quite efficient in shaded locations in
orbit) or increase the operating temp.

Got a detail wrong but the argument stands. Arguing thermodynamics may be
off topic for .trains so feel free to redirect or ask for redirection.



Message has 1 Reply:
  Re: Steam power (was: something else...)
 
(...) Since I'm quite sure you are arguing (Larry? Argue??) temperatures that are well above the range that LEGO trains run, I'd suggest .off-topic.geek... JohnG, GMLTC (23 years ago, 1-Nov-01, to lugnet.trains)

Message is in Reply To:
  Re: Gray VS. Black Metroliner Nose
 
(...) You can challenge it all you want. But you're not arguing with ME, you're arguing with thermodynamics. (unless you can show I've misapplied it) (...) and I bet their operating temperature differential is higher, too, being stationary. That's (...) (23 years ago, 1-Nov-01, to lugnet.trains)

34 Messages in This Thread:











Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR