Subject:
|
Re: Gray VS. Black Metroliner Nose
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.trains
|
Date:
|
Wed, 31 Oct 2001 06:35:34 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
716 times
|
| |
|
|
Larry Pieniazek wrote:
> In lugnet.trains, Jason J. Railton writes:
>
> >
> > Anyway, it's a diesel, so it'll look ugly whichever one you use. :-)
>
> c /ugly/elegant and efficient/
>
> Grow up, people. Steam lost. It costs too much.
Yikes! Did you mean for your response to Jason's joke to sound so
venomous? I didn't think the discussion was intended to upset.
Also, for die-hard, steam fans, steam may have lost, but it's far from
dead, and who knows, it seems it could still make a comeback! Check it
out: Modern steam locomotive developments:
http://www.steam.demon.co.uk/trains/modern.htm
And if you want to ride a steam train in the US (Steam railways are
noted):
States A-M
http://www.railsusa.com/tourist.shtml
States N-Z
http://www.railsusa.com/tourist2.shtml
Or see a steam train somewhere in the rest of the world (often still in
operation!):
http://dspace.dial.pipex.com/steam/internat.htm#Country
How cool is that?
Rick C.
Rick C.
|
|
Message has 2 Replies:
 | | Re: Gray VS. Black Metroliner Nose
|
| (...) Venemous??? Hardly! (...) I don't think it did! Jason's slagging me right back. (...) Plenty cool. Don't get me wrong, steam is neat. Steam engines are impressive. It's just not practical. It can never convert as high a percentage of input (...) (23 years ago, 31-Oct-01, to lugnet.trains)
| | | Re: Gray VS. Black Metroliner Nose
|
| (...) lol I don't think that that was Lar's intention at all, Rick. I think his troll is worse than his byte... (ouch, even *I* grimaced at that one:-) ++John (23 years ago, 31-Oct-01, to lugnet.trains)
|
Message is in Reply To:
34 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
