Subject:
|
Re: 8421 first impressions
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.technic
|
Date:
|
Fri, 1 Jul 2005 14:23:17 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
4220 times
|
| |
|
|
On 7/1/05, Philippe Hurbain <philohome@free.fr> wrote:
> > I think it is supposed to deliver more torque than the standard motor.
>
> Indeed... more torque, but lower efficiency:
> http://philohome.com/motors/motorcomp.htm
>
> Philo
Hmm - not a lot more torque, but a huge amoutn of additional
consumption, and fairly highly reduced efficiency. The 5292 appears
to definately be the American SUV of the Lego motor range. I take it
that for heavier torque - it is still better to either use two motors
together, or just gear down a lot?
Dannny
--
http://orionrobots.co.uk - Build Robots
Online Castle Building RPG -
http://www.darkthrone.com/recruit.dt?uid=V30311I30328J30379X30379E30260X30277
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: 8421 first impressions
|
| (...) Thanks for the info. Still, I don't see the need to use this motor in the 8421. It only uses one motor, and it is not a very demanding application. They could have used the minimotor easily. It would have been smaller and less expensive, and (...) (19 years ago, 1-Jul-05, to lugnet.technic)
|
Message is in Reply To:
26 Messages in This Thread:
  
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
