Subject:
|
Re: LEGO new crane: a step in the right direction?
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.technic
|
Date:
|
Thu, 6 Jan 2005 12:18:03 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
2828 times
|
| |
|
|
"Misha van Beek" <mishavanbeek@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:I9w9M4.1BLH@lugnet.com...
>
> It indeed looks pretty nice, though I have a few small problems with it. I • guess
> I'd be the only one prefering zero studded parts, and I doubt this model • having
> an elaborate suspension. It seems that it is broad enough though (14 studs
> needed for a full suspension as far as I'm concerned (steering, driving, • springs
> and differential)).
Sounds really interesting, do you have some examples of the techniques you
use to achieve this?
Jennifer
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: LEGO new crane: a step in the right direction?
|
| (...) ARG, I hate this type of posting, just when you got your whole message typed out, you hit the wrong button and it's all gone!! Well, here goes again: Yes, I have. Last year, I was sort of pissed about TLC's idea to name the blue Jeep "4WD", (...) (20 years ago, 6-Jan-05, to lugnet.technic)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: LEGO new crane: a step in the right direction?
|
| (...) It indeed looks pretty nice, though I have a few small problems with it. I guess I'd be the only one prefering zero studded parts, and I doubt this model having an elaborate suspension. It seems that it is broad enough though (14 studs needed (...) (20 years ago, 6-Jan-05, to lugnet.technic)
|
34 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
