 | | LEGO new crane: a step in the right direction? —Philippe Hurbain
|
| | | If this one is not a fake ((URL) looks like LEGO is coming back to some studded construction nicely complemented by studless parts... The RC motor is perhaps a bit oversized and over-powered but is well integrated. Classical (but good) use of a (...) (20 years ago, 5-Jan-05, to lugnet.technic)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: LEGO new crane: a step in the right direction? —Steve Lane
|
| | | | | (...) Strangely I got to see it once, and now I get the message that the folder isn't yet public. Anyway it looks great. This is the first technic set I've wanted to buy since the new backhoe. Obviously the Technic designer has encountered the (...) (20 years ago, 5-Jan-05, to lugnet.technic)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: LEGO new crane: a step in the right direction? —Tobbe Arnesson
|
| | | | | | | It's back up again, here's a direct link to the image just in case: (URL) pneumatics rising the boom look a little weak? I'd rather see it unpowere 'cause of cost but all my money go into mountain bike parts anyway :-D Regards, /Tobbe (20 years ago, 5-Jan-05, to lugnet.technic)
|
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | Re: LEGO new crane: a step in the right direction? —Jennifer Clark
|
| | | | | | | | "Tobbe Arnesson" <StPnAtM@lotek.nu> wrote in message news:I9uoIL.1LG4@lugnet.com... (...) In my opinion they were a bit weak in a similar configuration on the previous Technic crane, but then again, these are not heavy duty things :-) It is (...) (20 years ago, 5-Jan-05, to lugnet.technic)
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | Re: LEGO new crane: a step in the right direction? —Steve Lane
|
| | | | | | | | (...) I was just about to write that my guess would be that axle's 1,2, & 4 all steer when I noticed that neither of the warning beacons on the cab have shafts running down from them, that could be used to steer. Now it could be that the steering is (...) (20 years ago, 5-Jan-05, to lugnet.technic, FTX)
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | Re: LEGO new crane: a step in the right direction? —Philippe Hurbain
|
| | | | | | | | (...) Indeed I see no steering control. I hope there is some steering mechanism! But there is not much clearance between wheels. (...) No, these are the same wheels/tyres as (URL) 8436 truck> (and good old (URL) Barcode set>) Philo (20 years ago, 5-Jan-05, to lugnet.technic, FTX)
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | Re: LEGO new crane: a step in the right direction? —Vineet Honkan
|
| | | | | | | | I hope the steering is there (and it is as it should be, operated by the steering wheel, and not the exclusive headlight on top). (20 years ago, 6-Jan-05, to lugnet.technic, FTX)
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | Re: LEGO new crane: a step in the right direction? —Vineet Honkan
|
| | | | | | | | One problem I see with this crane pic is that one of the inlets on the pneumatic pistons doesn't have a tube in it. If someone could explain how this crane arm is supposed to be lifted, I'd really like to hear it. Thanks. (20 years ago, 7-Jan-05, to lugnet.technic, FTX)
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | Re: LEGO new crane: a step in the right direction? —Ross Crawford
|
| | | | | | | | (...) Hi Vineet, There are no hoses in the retract holes of either piston. It seems LEGO decided to just use gravity to retract them, if you have used pressure to lower the boom on [LEGOSet 8460] you'll realise this is probably a reasonable thing to (...) (20 years ago, 7-Jan-05, to lugnet.technic, FTX)
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: LEGO new crane: a step in the right direction? —Ross Crawford
|
| | | | | | (...) Yes it looks like (but I can't quite see how) it has a 3-section boom, which may be what the more powerful RC motor is being used for. (...) Well the 2 on this page (URL) both seem to indicate set number 7249, so I'm not sure whats going on (...) (20 years ago, 5-Jan-05, to lugnet.technic)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: LEGO new crane: a step in the right direction? —Jindrich Kubec
|
| | | | | | | (...) First one is a prototype. The one on the following photo is the Real McCrane ;-) (...) I cant's see anything like that? The boom is made of 3 large elements, 12 studs long, 3 bricks tall, 4 studs wide. Two of such elements hold the outriggers. (...) (20 years ago, 5-Jan-05, to lugnet.technic)
|
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | Re: LEGO new crane: a step in the right direction? —Ross Crawford
|
| | | | | | | | (...) Hmmm maybe you're right, and those elements are used to hold the outriggers too. I thought the 2-stud section at each end of those was separate, but looking at the boom, that isn't really possible. Oh well, maybe not as useful as I first (...) (20 years ago, 5-Jan-05, to lugnet.technic)
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: LEGO new crane: a step in the right direction? —Ronald Borchert
|
| | | | | | (...) Hi, this is _my_ original picture: (URL) scanned the official 2005 german dealer catalog at 27-11-2004. The crane pic is from the back side of the catalog. In the middle of the catalog the crane was shown with box, but it was very bad to scan. (...) (20 years ago, 5-Jan-05, to lugnet.technic)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: LEGO new crane: a step in the right direction? —Jindrich Kubec
|
| | | | | | (...) Not. This is the one for the release. (...) Most of the boxes in the early dealers catalogs are just mockups anyway. (...) This IMO proves my point. The pics I posted (with the kostky.org logo) are the pics of the real thing which will be in (...) (20 years ago, 6-Jan-05, to lugnet.technic)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: LEGO new crane: a step in the right direction? —Philippe Hurbain
|
| | | | | | (...) What is your source for the 8421 reference? TIA, Philo (20 years ago, 6-Jan-05, to lugnet.technic)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | Re: LEGO new crane: a step in the right direction? —Thomas Avery
|
| | | | | (...) If that is a fake, then there is a master builder behind it (Jennifer Clark :-) I have to get out of my rut and come back to the world of LEGO Technic! This set looks awesome. It is nice to see a blend of studded and studless parts, and this (...) (20 years ago, 5-Jan-05, to lugnet.technic)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: LEGO new crane: a step in the right direction? —Jennifer Clark
|
| | | | | | | "TJ Avery" <tjavery@texbrick.com> wrote in message news:I9ur9s.34x@lugnet.com... (...) Clark :-) It wisnae me! (...) Definitely. I bought the new Ferrari racing car and a couple of the new truck with crane for my Christmas, and they both look good. (...) (20 years ago, 5-Jan-05, to lugnet.technic)
|
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | Re: LEGO new crane: a step in the right direction? —Jan-Tore Skålvik
|
| | | | | | | | If there are a lack of steering I guess there isn't a very big problem to build one your self.. this actually are lego remember? :) happy new year (...) (20 years ago, 6-Jan-05, to lugnet.technic)
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: LEGO new crane: a step in the right direction? —Rob Antonishen
|
| | | | | | | (...) And check out the length of that axle on the boom! I wonder if it is the same x1263 as in the street hocky set? -Rob. (20 years ago, 5-Jan-05, to lugnet.technic)
|
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: LEGO new crane: a step in the right direction? —steven arnold
|
| | | | | | maybe this will be the set that brings me out of my dark year. steve (20 years ago, 10-Jan-05, to lugnet.technic)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | Re: LEGO new crane: a step in the right direction? —David Arnon
|
| | | | | (...) Yeah! The first set since <set:8455> I'm going to buy. I hope it won't be too expensive. - David (20 years ago, 5-Jan-05, to lugnet.technic)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: LEGO new crane: a step in the right direction? —Jonathan Wilson
|
| | | | | | (...) To me, this crane reminds me very much of the 8431 crane only with studless pieces and stuff. The main thing stopping me from getting one is the wheels (which are useless to me) (20 years ago, 6-Jan-05, to lugnet.technic)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: LEGO new crane: a step in the right direction? —Ross Crawford
|
| | | | | | (...) Send them to me!! ROSCO (20 years ago, 6-Jan-05, to lugnet.technic)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: LEGO new crane: a step in the right direction? —Vineet Honkan
|
| | | | | | One more thing; Does anyone know where y'all got this info on these upcoming sets? Any help would be greatly appreciated. Thanks. (20 years ago, 6-Jan-05, to lugnet.technic)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | Re: LEGO new crane: a step in the right direction? —David Koudys
|
| | | | | (...) It looks absolutely fantastic. If people want to send a message to the execs at TLC about what they want as far as Technic goes, I humbly suggest that they buy this set. And it doesn't have alotta 'bley' in it, so that'll keep the 'colour' (...) (20 years ago, 5-Jan-05, to lugnet.technic)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: LEGO new crane: a step in the right direction? —Vineet Honkan
|
| | | | | | | Hey y'all- I have to agree whith what Dave said about this crane. It is beautiful! (Personally I would have opted for four more axles, but I guess to each his/her own). I also am going to get one as soon as this model comes out (would any of y'all (...) (20 years ago, 5-Jan-05, to lugnet.technic)
|
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | re: missing parts —Steve Hassenplug
|
| | | | | | | | (...) no. None of the missing parts were included in mine. (20 years ago, 5-Jan-05, to lugnet.technic)
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | Re: missing parts —Vineet Honkan
|
| | | | | | | | | What I meant to say was, did the set have any missing pieces? (20 years ago, 5-Jan-05, to lugnet.technic)
|
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | Re: missing parts —Mark Tarrabain
|
| | | | | | | | (...) Speaking of missing parts.... (sorry, change of topic here...) What's the recommended course of action when a person _does_ discover that there is a missing piece in a set? I mean, it's all very well and good to just return it to the store and (...) (20 years ago, 5-Jan-05, to lugnet.technic, lugnet.general)
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: LEGO new crane: a step in the right direction? —Vineet Honkan
|
| | | | | | This may have been posted earlier, I don't know, but it looks like these newer models are remakes of the older, more popular ones from the 90s. Does anyone agree with me? (20 years ago, 5-Jan-05, to lugnet.technic)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | Re: LEGO new crane: a step in the right direction? —Misha van Beek
|
| | | | | (...) It indeed looks pretty nice, though I have a few small problems with it. I guess I'd be the only one prefering zero studded parts, and I doubt this model having an elaborate suspension. It seems that it is broad enough though (14 studs needed (...) (20 years ago, 6-Jan-05, to lugnet.technic)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: LEGO new crane: a step in the right direction? —Jennifer Clark
|
| | | | | | "Misha van Beek" <mishavanbeek@gmail.com> wrote in message news:I9w9M4.1BLH@lugnet.com... (...) guess (...) having (...) springs (...) Sounds really interesting, do you have some examples of the techniques you use to achieve this? Jennifer (20 years ago, 6-Jan-05, to lugnet.technic)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: LEGO new crane: a step in the right direction? —Misha van Beek
|
| | | | | | (...) ARG, I hate this type of posting, just when you got your whole message typed out, you hit the wrong button and it's all gone!! Well, here goes again: Yes, I have. Last year, I was sort of pissed about TLC's idea to name the blue Jeep "4WD", (...) (20 years ago, 6-Jan-05, to lugnet.technic)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | Re: LEGO new crane: a step in the right direction? —steven arnold
|
| | | | maybe this will be the set that brings me out of my dark year. i allready have something in the works... (20 years ago, 10-Jan-05, to lugnet.technic)
|
| | | | |
