Subject:
|
Re: Bram Lambrecht 's spaceplane
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.space
|
Date:
|
Tue, 29 May 2001 22:58:45 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
464 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.space, Matthew Gerber writes:
> Hey Bram,
>
> I think Larry was focusing more on the statement "But a 100 piece MOC that
> makes you go wow is WAY more remarkable.".
>
> I mean, I do the same thing...while models like your space plane TOTALLY
> blow me away in detail, size, design and obvious amount of time taken, there
> is something about a small model (or limited parts, also) that is done so
> well that it floors you. The origami mech that have been making the rounds
> come readily to mind...I mean, look at the amount of detail, precision and
> articulation being squeezed into a model just a few inches high.
>
> It's in the limiting of scale/parts that the genius comes through, ya' know?
> When building at the scale of your space plane, it's almost like you have an
> infinite canvas and an infinite pallate to work with/from, so it's ALMOST a
> given that you will come up with something great, but the ability to do AND
> keep it small, that's just as great. Am I right Larry?
Yep.
Thanks for clarifying that Matthew, it's exactly what I meant, but stated
much more clearly.
When I wrote my post I was thinking about what Mladen said (in the "why some
models get feedback" thread)... I came away thinking he was saying he was
more impressed by large models than small ones. That may not be exactly what
he meant. But if it is, I don't quite agree with it.
Without demeaning the difficulty factors that Bram outlines to do with large
models (all valid) I still think small IS hard. You have to plan more
carefully. (why do I like 6 wide better than 8 wide trains? because it's harder)
But Bram, you have no worries. You're an ace modeler in my book, at any size
factor you choose. Real OR virtual.
> My 2¢,
See your 2 and raise you one. :-)
++Lar
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: Bram Lambrecht 's spaceplane
|
| (...) I you ever bother to look at my models, you will notice that most of them are quite small. Here is what I was trying to say: Yes, very large, well designed and thought out models (like Bram's) deserve recognition! Yes, very small, detailed and (...) (23 years ago, 29-May-01, to lugnet.space)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: Bram Lambrecht 's spaceplane
|
| Hey Bram, I think Larry was focusing more on the statement "But a 100 piece MOC that makes you go wow is WAY more remarkable.". I mean, I do the same thing...while models like your space plane TOTALLY blow me away in detail, size, design and obvious (...) (23 years ago, 29-May-01, to lugnet.space)
|
42 Messages in This Thread:
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
