Subject:
|
Re: Giant space ship links site idea
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.space
|
Date:
|
Wed, 4 Oct 2000 16:48:24 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
461 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.space, Mark Sandlin wrote:
> > From: "Jon Palmer" <jpalmer@oklahoma.net>
> > -Do you think the main list should also have small thumbnails next to the
> > links within the site?
>
> Yes. Wading through text links is very annoying. If the thumbs are sized
> reasonably, it shouldn't be much of a problem for people who have slow
> connections.
It also helps if the thumbnails have height, width, and alt-text
attributes. That makes it easier to read the page, while the images are
still downloading.
> > -If this gets going I'd like to make a specific section for
> > nano/microfig large ships. Any ship that is designed as a capital size. What
> > do you think?
>
> I think that would be good. The casual observer would likely be confused by
> the term "microfig" and they'd wonder what all these teeny globs of bricks
> are doing next to the big spaceships. ( The casual observer probably
> wouldn't realize at first that they were supposed to be viewing them as
> "large" spaceships)
Call it "microfig scale", and give a link at the top: "What the heck does
'Microfig' mean?".
Steve
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Giant space ship links site idea
|
| (...) 60 studs? That's kind of short, IMO. For instance, of the ships on my website, the Mithrandir is the only one I'd consider to be a "capital" ship, and a small one at that. Some of my other ships are more than 60 studs long, and certainly not (...) (24 years ago, 3-Oct-00, to lugnet.space)
|
25 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
