To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.spaceOpen lugnet.space in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Space / 2512
2511  |  2513
Subject: 
Re: Space Stations... (and Space Relations)
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.space
Date: 
Fri, 16 Jun 2000 14:56:55 GMT
Viewed: 
651 times
  
In lugnet.space, George Haberberger writes:
I'm working on several kinds of space craft, and I like having the constraints
of technology, it forces me to make me craft more realistic, at least for me.

For my near future craft, they use chemical propulsion, so I have to include
rocket fuel tanks. If the occupants need pseudo-gravity in space, they have to
rotate their ships.

The next generation uses fission heated rockets (something like NERVA), so
each ships needs a working nuclear reactor close to the nozzle, with tanks and
shielding between the reactor and the crews quarters. They have enough thrust
not to need rotation to produce pseudo gravity.

The generation after that will use fusion, and should be much smaller and more
efficient than the fission powered craft, but they will need a fusion drive
spine, like Niven details.

In short, I feel I can be more creative working within a limiting structure,
but then I like Bach better than Schonberg, for a poor analogy.

Yes. Actualy, the LegoWars has a strict rule. You may not use technology
unless it might be created at this time, so thats what I do. :) In short, I
pretty much agree with you.

Ooh, antimatter, that can be my generation after fusion. Thanks!

Oh yes, quite nice stuff. My newest ship, the Peryodention, is armed with a
DFKOAA, or Dual Fire Kalahasi Orion Antimatter Autocannon. :) Now that is
quite a mouthful.

Agreed.

Good! I was thinkin of saying, when Tom said, "Should this really take off,",
"Yes, should it really take off, what planet would it come from?" :)

I'm buying a bigger hard drive for Father's day, which will let me access my
digital camera again, and may be start posting some of MOCs.

Good! Do you have Ldraw? If so, try making some of them, and then we can put
them in the landing bays of the Space Station.

--
Mark Nelson
Speedy's Lego Page: http://www.pressenter.com/~3nelsons/lego/



Message is in Reply To:
  Re: Space Stations... (and Space Relations)
 
(...) I'm working on several kinds of space craft, and I like having the constraints of technology, it forces me to make me craft more realistic, at least for me. For my near future craft, they use chemical propulsion, so I have to include rocket (...) (24 years ago, 16-Jun-00, to lugnet.space)

41 Messages in This Thread:











Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR