Subject:
|
Re: Armageddon Class Destroyer
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.space
|
Date:
|
Thu, 26 Jul 2001 17:20:30 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1709 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.space, John Kornhaus writes:
> Please note: As a public service for the humor impaired, the content of
> this message has been thoroughly reviewed and all potentially humorous
> material has been removed prior to posting.(1)
>
>
> In article <GH1r4K.Fz7@lugnet.com>, Jesse Alan Long
> <joyous4god2@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> > Perhaps I am, Anthony and thank you for having a civil attitude in telling
> > me this information. SOME people, namely Nathan, need to learn this in
> > their lives.
>
> Jesse, I believe the issue Nathan took offense with was your insistence
> on identifying "errors" in other people's posts.
>
>
> > This information was truly unknown to me and I was simply
> > asking questions
>
> No, you weren't, at least as expressed in your post. You were
> misrepresenting your erroneous opinion as indisputable fact. The tone
> of your message implied that you had superior knowledge of the
> provenance of LEGO elements which you later admit were "somewhat
> obscured" from your view.
>
> Since Nathan actually constructed the MOC in question, don't you think
> it would be a good idea to give him the benefit of the doubt when he
> identifies pieces used in its construction? If you truly believe a
> piece has been misidentified, perhaps you could ask "Is the Arctic
> windscreen the same as that used in the Explorien or Spyrius themes?"
> rather than pointing out supposed errors.
>
>
> > and not acting like an idiot.
>
> Um, yeah.(2)
>
>
> I think you would be well served by registering for "English
> Composition 101"(4) as you prepare for the fall term at whatever school
> you attend. Improved skills in sentence structure and organization
> would greatly benefit the comprehension of your often disjointed posts.
>
> At the very least, try reading your posts before hitting the "send"
> button.(5) Then, read it again. Ask someone else to read it. After
> that, edit, edit, edit! When you are sure it is ready to post, read it
> again.
>
> You may also want to refer to this url as necessary when reading posts
> and composing your replies:
>
> http://www.dictionary.com/
>
>
> For what it's worth, I don't believe anyone in the .space group
> actively hates you. It's more of a feeling of exasperation with a
> repeated pattern of behavior.
>
>
> jk
> --
> AFOL and his money are soon parted
>
>
> (1) That's a joke, son.
> (2) Not meant to characterize your behavior in any way. I simply have
> no other appropriate comment to make.
> (3) There is *NO* note 3. Don't argue with me.
> (4) Or any class covering similar subject matter.
> (5) Or whatever interface element your
> newsreader/web-browser/inter-cranial-neural-netlink uses to initiate
> the process of posting the message to LUGNET.
I said that I did not know that the part WAS a different shape than what I
was used to in my LEGO Space creations. I never knew such a part existed.
I believe you need to read the post that Anthony sent to me again, John.
Jesse Long
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Armageddon Class Destroyer
|
| Please note: As a public service for the humor impaired, the content of this message has been thoroughly reviewed and all potentially humorous material has been removed prior to posting.(1) (...) Jesse, I believe the issue Nathan took offense with (...) (25 years ago, 26-Jul-01, to lugnet.space)
|
27 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
