| | Re: light sensor problem?
|
|
(...) I supposed so, but only to get a "fast scaling"? (...) I can "rescale" those values by theoretical calculation and maintain >>7 or make the right conversion (0-100). Now I've done the right scaling (ready to commit), but I sincerely think that (...) (24 years ago, 25-Jul-00, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
|
| | RE: light sensor problem?
|
|
(...) And I'll add the reminder (for all the newbies) that without Kekoa's efforts in doing the low-level documentation, we would not be where we are today.... Thanks again, Kekoa....... As a side note, I wonder how the power to the LCD controller (...) (24 years ago, 25-Jul-00, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
|
| | Re: light sensor problem?
|
|
(...) I personally forget the numbers of the lugnet posts. The gist is that the firmware and LegOS were, at the time, different in a critical way. I don't know the current status of LegOS. At the time, LegOS cycled through the 4 A/D sensors, reading (...) (24 years ago, 25-Jul-00, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
|
| | Re: Rotation Sensor Values
|
|
This is the whole directory command dump. These errors are half-corrected if I specify ../include/*.h in the include# line. Then I get errors about not being able to find other *.h's that the originals included. Makefile:41: .depend: No such file or (...) (24 years ago, 25-Jul-00, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
|
| | Re: Rotation Sensor Values
|
|
Oops. When I copied it, that statement got left out, and I put it bck in in the incoorect place. The original version of the code had the return in the outside loop. I know it is this way because I could turn the rotation sensor slowly, and see the (...) (24 years ago, 25-Jul-00, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
|
| | Re: Persistent globals
|
|
(...) Wonderful! (Oh, and good morning, Eddie ;) I'm putting some stuff into the HOWTO as we speak- I'll mention that. Luis ---...--- "Summertime... and the living is easy... fish are jumping and the cotton is high... So hush, little baby, baby (...) (24 years ago, 25-Jul-00, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
|
| | Re: Persistent globals
|
|
(...) I just committed a header file persistent.h with comment on how to use __persistent in your files. I also updated genlds.c to move the persistent data to the right place. Eddie C. Dost ecd@skynet.be (24 years ago, 25-Jul-00, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
|
| | Re: Rotation Sensor Values
|
|
(...) Could you please post the compile command the makefile generates to the list, including the error? Like in: ecd@reset:~/lego/min...egOS/demo> make /usr/local/bin/h8300...hi-hms-gcc -O2 -fno-builtin -fomit-frame-pointer -Wall (...) (24 years ago, 25-Jul-00, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
|
| | Re: Rotation Sensor Values
|
|
(...) Yes. It will only display two counter readings, then stop! See the "return 0;" statement. It is inside the while (1) loop. Take it out of the loop, and I am shure this one will also work. At least with 0.2.4 it does. (...) Here the return (...) (24 years ago, 25-Jul-00, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
|
| | Re: Persistent globals
|
|
(...) No. You can not easily see the difference between static and non static data in the linker scripts to decide into which section to put the data. I would recomment a header file "persistent.h" and some documentation about that. We could modify (...) (24 years ago, 25-Jul-00, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
|
| | Re: Rotation Sensor Values
|
|
I am using Linux. It is a minimalistic setup, but I have downloaded all of the extra stff that needs to be used for legOS. Before this error happens, legOS.srec is built, which I did not know before. Now I get errors involving the include files in (...) (24 years ago, 25-Jul-00, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
|
| | Re: Rotation Sensor Values
|
|
(...) Hmm. DJGPP or Cygwin? I thought it was cygwin, but that sounds like a DJGPP problem. (...) Again, DJGPP or Cygwin? Thanks, Andy- I'm sorry to bug you, but I'd really hate to be responsible for putting out something that I know is broken. Luis (...) (24 years ago, 25-Jul-00, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
|
| | Re: Rotation Sensor Values
|
|
I downloaded the tarball, and tried to compile it. when I an in /boot, it tries to do a genlds, and exits with an error. When I try to run genlds, it says Segmentation Error(or fault, I can't remember). I think the only reason that I can use 0.2.3 (...) (24 years ago, 25-Jul-00, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
|
| | Re: Rotation Sensor Values
|
|
Ack! You are still having problems with 0.2.4? I thought your problem was with the compiler, and not legOS? <flips through old Andy Gombos posts on lugnet> Is this still the merge-map problem? I figured out the situation, and fixed it in CVS. Sorry (...) (24 years ago, 25-Jul-00, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
|
| | Re: Rotation Sensor Values
|
|
I figured you would be glad that I was not running 0.2.4. I cannot get it to compile correctly, so I use 0.2.3 instead. The two full programs are below, in case you wanted to see them in full. Andy ----This one does not work---- #include <dsensor.h> (...) (24 years ago, 25-Jul-00, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
|
| | Re: Rotation Sensor Values
|
|
(...) phew :) Had me scared there for a while. I'll probably still take a look at it later- I just didn't want to have caused a bug so soon after starting to apply patches. Luis (...) ---...--- "Summertime... and the living is easy... fish are (...) (24 years ago, 24-Jul-00, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
|
| | Re: Rotation Sensor Values
|
|
Hee, Hee. It was 0.2.3, not 0.2.4. Here is the code snippet that setup and read the values. The current(working) code takes out the refresh, and changes the delay to msleep. ds_active(&SENSOR_2); ds_rotation_on(&SENSOR_2); (...) (24 years ago, 24-Jul-00, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
|
| | Re: Persistent globals
|
|
(...) Do you think that is possible to change the behavier of legOS loading to obtain the expected behavier for static data without the trick? Bye, Paolo. --- "Do not follow where the path my lead Go instead where there is no path and leave a (...) (24 years ago, 24-Jul-00, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
|
| | Re: light sensor problem?
|
|
(...) That should be great! :-) (...) use (...) Absolutely True!!!! :-) (...) I'm quite sure that you can do it!!!! :-) And this should be a real step forward!!!! What a beautiful thing to have some time to spend in this section of code... :-) I'm (...) (24 years ago, 24-Jul-00, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
|
| | Re: light sensor problem?
|
|
(...) Let me think about how to uncouple this from sys_time, so the code can get higher resolutions. (...) Yes, but even if all active sensors are turned of we are running with a lot of CPU power due to the high sampling speed. If you lower the (...) (24 years ago, 24-Jul-00, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|