Subject:
|
Re: Rotation Sensor Values
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos
|
Date:
|
Tue, 25 Jul 2000 00:12:27 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1629 times
|
| |
|
|
I figured you would be glad that I was not running 0.2.4. I cannot get it to
compile correctly, so I use 0.2.3 instead. The two full programs are below, in
case you wanted to see them in full.
Andy
----This one does not work----
#include <dsensor.h>
#include <unistd.h>
#include <conio.h>
#include <rom/lcd.h>
#include <dlcd.h>
int main(int argc,char **argv) {
ds_active(&SENSOR_2);
ds_rotation_on(&SENSOR_2);
ds_rotation_set(&SENSOR_2,0);
lcd_number(SENSOR_2,sign,e0); //show the starting number
lcd_refresh();
while(1){
lcd_number(SENSOR_2,sign,e0);
lcd_refresh();
delay(50);
return 0;
}
}
----This one does----
#include <dsensor.h>
#include <rom/lcd.h>
int main(int argc,char **argv) {
ds_active(&SENSOR_2);
ds_rotation_on(&SENSOR_2);
ds_rotation_set(&SENSOR_2,0);
while(1){
lcd_number(ROTATION_2,sign,e0);
msleep(50);
}
return 0;
}
In lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos, Luis Villa writes:
> On Mon, 24 Jul 2000, Andy Gombos wrote:
> > Hee, Hee. It was 0.2.3, not 0.2.4.
>
> phew :) Had me scared there for a while. I'll probably still take a look
> at it later- I just didn't want to have caused a bug so soon after
> starting to apply patches.
>
> Luis
>
> > Here is the code snippet that setup and read
> > the values. The current(working) code takes out the refresh, and changes the
> > delay to msleep.
> >
> > ds_active(&SENSOR_2);
> > ds_rotation_on(&SENSOR_2);
> > ds_rotation_set(&SENSOR_2,0);
> > while(1){
> > lcd_number(ROTATION_2,sign,e0);
> > lcd_refresh();
> > delay(50);
> > }
> > return 0;
> >
> > Andy
> > In lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos, Luis Villa writes:
> > > On Mon, 24 Jul 2000, Andy Gombos wrote:
> > > > I added back in the display code, and left out the lcd_refreshes. Then I • got
> > a
> > > > proper counter. I wonder why the refresh was throwing the reading off.
> > >
> > > That's a good question. Is this the latest tarball? If so, there have been
> > > some modifications to the refresh loop, and this may indicate a bug in
> > > them. In other words, it could be the double sets of lcd_refresh()
> > > and not the actual reading that was bad. Could you post both sets of code,
> > > so that we can take a look at them?
> > > Luis
> > >
> > >
> > > > In lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos, Andy Gombos writes:
> > > > > Well, I do not know if I have to have code to display the values. I do • not
> > get
> > > > > anything on
> > > > > screen when I run this code. If I put a loop, and with every loop, the • sensor
> > > > > value is being displayed, then I get the values mentioned before. I run • the
> > > > > initialization steps also, and still get the bogus values.
> > > > >
> > > > > Andy
> > > > > In lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos, Luis Villa writes:
> > > > > > On Mon, 24 Jul 2000, Andy Gombos wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > I was reading about rotation sensors for legOS for a new robot, and
> > > > > > > thought I'd try it out. So, I made a simple program that would show
> > > > > > > rotation sensor values on the display. What I got was not what I
> > > > > > > expected. I have never used the rotation sensors in legOS before, so • I
> > > > > > > do not know if this behavior was expected. Anyway, I got values of
> > > > > > > 9999, -9999, 64, and -64 (more that once). I think that these values
> > > > > > > correspond to the RAW values that I got from switchinf quadrants in
> > > > > > > the sensor. Are these the expected values, or are you supposed to get
> > > > > > > 0,1,2, -5,2, like in the regular lego firmware?
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Andy-
> > > > > > Have you set up the rotation sensors correctly? You need to do a few
> > > > > > things before you get reasonable values for the rotation sensor.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > 1) use ds_active(&SENSOR_1) to turn on the sensor.
> > > > > > 2) use ds_rotation_on(&SENSOR_1) to turn on the rotation processing in • the
> > > > > > kernel.
> > > > > > 3) use ds_rotation_set(&SENSOR_1, int X) to set the sensor to X. I • believe
> > > > > > that the default for this is undefined, so unless you use rotation set • at
> > > > > > least once, you could easily get an undefined value > 9999 or < -9999.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Once you've done all that, what you should see is just a counter, • noting
> > > > > > the number of sixteenths of rotations that have occurred. (i.e., when • the
> > > > > > counter reads 16, one rotation will have occurred.)
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Hope that helps- please let us know if you still have problems-
> > > > > > Luis
> > > > > >
> > > > > > -----------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > > > >
> > > > > > "Summertime... and the living is easy...
> > > > > > fish are jumping and the cotton is high...
> > > > > > So hush, little baby, baby don't you cry."
> > > > > > -Ella
> > > > > >
> > > > > > -----------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > > -----------------------------------------------------------------------
> > >
> > > "Summertime... and the living is easy...
> > > fish are jumping and the cotton is high...
> > > So hush, little baby, baby don't you cry."
> > > -Ella
> > >
> > > -----------------------------------------------------------------------
> >
> >
>
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> "Summertime... and the living is easy...
> fish are jumping and the cotton is high...
> So hush, little baby, baby don't you cry."
> -Ella
>
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
Message has 2 Replies:
 | | Re: Rotation Sensor Values
|
| Ack! You are still having problems with 0.2.4? I thought your problem was with the compiler, and not legOS? <flips through old Andy Gombos posts on lugnet> Is this still the merge-map problem? I figured out the situation, and fixed it in CVS. Sorry (...) (24 years ago, 25-Jul-00, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
| | | Re: Rotation Sensor Values
|
| (...) Yes. It will only display two counter readings, then stop! See the "return 0;" statement. It is inside the while (1) loop. Take it out of the loop, and I am shure this one will also work. At least with 0.2.4 it does. (...) Here the return (...) (24 years ago, 25-Jul-00, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: Rotation Sensor Values
|
| (...) phew :) Had me scared there for a while. I'll probably still take a look at it later- I just didn't want to have caused a bug so soon after starting to apply patches. Luis (...) ---...--- "Summertime... and the living is easy... fish are (...) (24 years ago, 24-Jul-00, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
16 Messages in This Thread:
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
