Subject:
|
Re: light sensor problem?
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos
|
Date:
|
Mon, 24 Jul 2000 22:38:31 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
5120 times
|
| |
|
|
> > X millisecond is too late... :-)
>
> Let me think about how to uncouple this from sys_time, so the code can
> get higher resolutions.
That should be great! :-)
> > Actual legOS implementation already turn off active sensors if not in • use
> > or no program is run.
>
> Yes, but even if all active sensors are turned of we are running
> with a lot of CPU power due to the high sampling speed. If you lower
> the sampling rate, the CPU will idle longer, thus save more power.
Absolutely True!!!! :-)
> > I also like your code, if only it could sample faster... :-(((
>
> Let me sleep over this, and have my measurements done in our lab.
> I am shure there is a solution with flexible sampling rate from
> X ms range down to the 0.X ms range.
>
> This could be made to default to most power saving (and apropriate
> for many applications), but changeable by the user through some function
> like ds_set_sampling_rate(XXX us).
I'm quite sure that you can do it!!!! :-) And this should be a real step
forward!!!!
What a beautiful thing to have some time to spend in this section of code...
:-) I'm now in a low free time period... :-)
Just waiting for your rewrite! :-)
Bye,
Paolo.
---
"You look strong enough to pull the ears off a Gundark." - Han Solo
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: light sensor problem?
|
| (...) Let me think about how to uncouple this from sys_time, so the code can get higher resolutions. (...) Yes, but even if all active sensors are turned of we are running with a lot of CPU power due to the high sampling speed. If you lower the (...) (26 years ago, 24-Jul-00, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
26 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
