To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legosOpen lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Robotics / RCX / legOS / 1258
1257  |  1259
Subject: 
Re: light sensor problem?
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos
Date: 
Mon, 24 Jul 2000 01:04:01 GMT
Viewed: 
2472 times
  
I'm not sure which comments you are referring to- do you have a URL for
the lugnet post?

http://www.lugnet.com/robotics/rcx/legos/?n=203

I doubt we need this very fast reading of sensors. This makes implementing
more sophisticated events like change over time and such harder.

You mean change over time of the sensors? Shouldn't that kind of stuff be
done in "user space" anyway?

Yes, when we have user space timers...

As far as assembly goes, I have to say that the current implementation is
pretty tame.

This is correct, but there are many good reasons for keeping assembly
low bandwidth, like pitfalls in assembler embedded in c source
(see our memcpy problem). If the compiler is bad and we need speed, the
speed argument wins, though.

Can we also add this to the 0.2.5 todo list? Again, this is a pretty big
change (possibly).

Of course. I totally agree to have these ideas collected first, and get
0.2.4 out. This keeps a lot of pressure out of the development of new
things, as it would not be that hard if they work not fully from scratch.


Eddie C. Dost
ecd@skynet.be



Message has 1 Reply:
  Re: light sensor problem?
 
(...) proof that this occurs (even though his logic does seem pretty dead on.) (...) Well, we do... time_t current_time = sys_time; while (sys_time < current_time + the amount of time I want to wait) { do nothing; } It's not pretty, but it is (...) (24 years ago, 24-Jul-00, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)

Message is in Reply To:
  Re: light sensor problem?
 
(...) :) Bad is, of course, all relative... (...) Yes, though IMHO fast = good. It allows us to do things with legOS that might not be doable with other firmwares. (...) I'm not sure which comments you are referring to- do you have a URL for the (...) (24 years ago, 24-Jul-00, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)

26 Messages in This Thread:








Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR