To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legosOpen lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Robotics / RCX / legOS / 1258
1257  |  1259
Subject: 
Re: light sensor problem?
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos
Date: 
Mon, 24 Jul 2000 01:04:01 GMT
Viewed: 
5372 times
  
> I'm not sure which comments you are referring to- do you have a URL for
> the lugnet post?

http://www.lugnet.com/robotics/rcx/legos/?n=203

> > I doubt we need this very fast reading of sensors. This makes implementing
> > more sophisticated events like change over time and such harder.
> 
> You mean change over time of the sensors? Shouldn't that kind of stuff be
> done in "user space" anyway?

Yes, when we have user space timers...

> As far as assembly goes, I have to say that the current implementation is
> pretty tame.

This is correct, but there are many good reasons for keeping assembly
low bandwidth, like pitfalls in assembler embedded in c source
(see our memcpy problem). If the compiler is bad and we need speed, the
speed argument wins, though.

> Can we also add this to the 0.2.5 todo list? Again, this is a pretty big
> change (possibly).

Of course. I totally agree to have these ideas collected first, and get
0.2.4 out. This keeps a lot of pressure out of the development of new
things, as it would not be that hard if they work not fully from scratch.


Eddie C. Dost
ecd@skynet.be



Message has 1 Reply:
  Re: light sensor problem?
 
(...) proof that this occurs (even though his logic does seem pretty dead on.) (...) Well, we do... time_t current_time = sys_time; while (sys_time < current_time + the amount of time I want to wait) { do nothing; } It's not pretty, but it is (...) (26 years ago, 24-Jul-00, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)

Message is in Reply To:
  Re: light sensor problem?
 
(...) :) Bad is, of course, all relative... (...) Yes, though IMHO fast = good. It allows us to do things with legOS that might not be doable with other firmwares. (...) I'm not sure which comments you are referring to- do you have a URL for the (...) (26 years ago, 24-Jul-00, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)

26 Messages in This Thread:








Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR