|
 | | Re: Light sensor question
|
| Hi Matt, I'll try to help. :o) First, you have to specify the type of sensor that is hooked on the port. You do that with: type port SENSOR_TYPE Let me know if you need to know the different values for 'type'. 3 is a light sensor. Ports are numbered (...) (22 years ago, 15-Jul-02, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.pbforth)
| |
|  
range
(score: 0.459)
|
|
| |
|
usb
(score: 0.459)
|
|
| | FW: pbForth vs RCX 1.0
|
| -----Original Message----- From: rhempel@bmts.com [mailto:rhempel@bmts.com] Sent: Thursday, June 27, 2002 4:21 AM To: Mario Ferrari; lugnet.robotics.rcx....lugnet.com Cc: rhempel@bmts.com Subject: Re: pbForth vs RCX 1.0 Can RCX 2.0 communicate with (...) (22 years ago, 30-Jun-02, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.pbforth)
| |
|
ir
(score: 0.459)
|
|
| | RE: pbForth vs RCX 1.0
|
| (...) What you describe would work exactly. Normally, the "outer interpreter" of pbForth waits for input using "KEY" - which of course is just a char from the IR. You can make a special word that waits for anything you like... Cheers, Ralph (22 years ago, 30-Jun-02, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.pbforth)
| |
|
ir
(score: 0.459)
|
|
| | Re: pbForth vs RCX 1.0
|
| "Mario Beaulieu" <mariobeaulieu@videotron.ca> writes... (...) Yes. I run pbForth on RCX 1.0, 1.5 and 2.0. No differences. (...) No, to my knowledge. In pbForth the IR port is entirely devoted to communication between the brick and the terminal. (...) (22 years ago, 27-Jun-02, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.pbforth)
| |
|
ir
(score: 0.458)
|
|
| |
|
ir
(score: 0.458)
|
|
| |
|
tower
(score: 0.458)
|
|
| |
|
usb
(score: 0.457)
|
|
| | RE: Displaying info while debugging
|
| Yes, rcxTcl is probably looking at the data coming in on the IR and buffering it until there is a pause. I'll check it out this week and send out an update if I can.... How are you making out otherwise with pbForth? Cheers, Ralph (...) (22 years ago, 15-Jun-02, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.pbforth)
| |
|
ir
(score: 0.456)
|
|
| | Re: RCX Tower Internals
|
| (...) I'm pretty sure the echo is not direct, it goes out through the emitters and back into the receiver. This is demonstrated by varying the lighting conditions and/or the baud rate and noting the response. If the echo were direct, you'd receive (...) (25 years ago, 10-Jun-99, to lugnet.robotics.rcx)
| |
|
long, tower
(score: 0.455)
|
|
| | RE: CPR for RCX?
|
| (...) Matt, Just because the LCD is blank does not mean that pbForth is not running. When you power the RCX on and pbForth is the firmware, the LCD is blanked. Can you communicate over the IR link? If so, you're fine. If you DO need to remove the (...) (22 years ago, 6-Jun-02, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.pbforth)
| |
|
ir
(score: 0.454)
|
|
| | Re: linux USB driver.
|
| Itried to install the linux usb drive on mu computer with redhat 7.2 and 2.4.9-21 kernel. It did not work, this is the error message returned. What's wrong? /Hans Karlsson [root@nisse usb_lego]# make cc -O2 -Wall -Wstrict-prototypes (...) (23 years ago, 12-Feb-02, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
| |
|
usb
(score: 0.454)
|
|
| | remote
|
| Hello, I’m just recently getting back into playing with Legos. I bought my first house and had to fix it up before I could play. BrickOS was a lot easier to get into this time around thanks to BricxCC. BrickOS itself is better documented and has new (...) (20 years ago, 8-Nov-04, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
| |
|
long
(score: 0.452)
|
|
| | remote
|
| Hello, I’m just recently getting back into playing with Legos. I bought my first house and had to fix it up before I could play. BrickOS was a lot easier to get into this time around thanks to BricxCC. BrickOS itself is better documented and has new (...) (20 years ago, 8-Nov-04, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
| |
|
long
(score: 0.452)
|
|
| |
|
usb
(score: 0.452)
|
|
| |
|
usb
(score: 0.451)
|
|
| |
|
long
(score: 0.450)
|
|
| | Re: What about this for a new RCX 2.5 setup?
|
| Oh, and I forgot one of the "BIGGEST" wishes on the list: 5) Linksys wireless access port response rather than the directional IR port. Or at least SOME form of 900MHz+ communication that is non-directional, with higher bandwidth (who knows...maybe (...) (22 years ago, 10-May-02, to lugnet.robotics.rcx)
| |
|
ir
(score: 0.450)
|
|
| |
|
long
(score: 0.450)
|
|
| | Re: CPR for RCX?
|
| (...) Thanks. Good to know. (...) I'm familiar with that procedure, too. Thank goodness for the '-firmfast' flag in NQC... I do have another question, though (Oh, the joys of actually testing on real hardware...) 1) When I load a program, does it (...) (22 years ago, 7-Jun-02, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.pbforth)
| |
|
tower
(score: 0.450)
|
