To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.robotics.rcx.pbforthOpen lugnet.robotics.rcx.pbforth in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Robotics / RCX / pbFORTH / 520
519  |  521
Subject: 
FW: pbForth vs RCX 1.0
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.robotics.rcx.pbforth
Date: 
Sun, 30 Jun 2002 01:21:10 GMT
Reply-To: 
<rhempel@bmts.&Spamcake&com>
Viewed: 
2301 times
  
-----Original Message-----
From: rhempel@bmts.com [mailto:rhempel@bmts.com]
Sent: Thursday, June 27, 2002 4:21 AM
To: Mario Ferrari; lugnet.robotics.rcx.pbforth@lugnet.com
Cc: rhempel@bmts.com
Subject: Re: pbForth vs RCX 1.0


Can RCX 2.0 communicate with RCX
1.0 in pbForth (using IR ports)?

No, to my knowledge. In pbForth the IR port is • entirely devoted to
communication between the brick and the • terminal. There are no words to
send/receive data through the IR port. That • would be quite a nice addition,
but I wonder if it is possible.

Of course wou can talk through the IR ports
to other RCX's.

The word EMIT lets you send arbitrary characters
out the IR port. In fact, I was working on a
pbForth extension that looks at the IR protocol
from the remote and decodes it.

Maybe it's time for another tutorial...

Cheers,
Ralph

-



Message has 1 Reply:
  Re: pbForth vs RCX 1.0
 
(...) Yes, please :-) I actually knew the EMIT and KEY words, but had never thought of using them to make two RCXs communicate. For some stupid reason in my head I was expecting some special API words was necessary to manage this communcation, while (...) (22 years ago, 2-Jul-02, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.pbforth)

2 Messages in This Thread:

Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR