 | | Re: LegOS 0.2.2 on Win95 (almost)
|
|
Guys, please keep keeping the list (and myself) up to date- I want to make sure the next HOWTO has good win95 instructions from go. -Luis (who may actually work some on the HOWTO this weekend... woohoo!) (...) ###...### Profanity is the one language (...) (25 years ago, 24-Nov-99, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
| |
| | Re: LegOS 0.2.2 on Win95 (almost)
|
|
Hi Peter, This is just as far as I got too. My next step is going to be to build the compiler with Markus' patch applied. But if you get to it first, that would be swell. Jonathan (...) (25 years ago, 24-Nov-99, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
| |
| | Re: LegOS 0.2.2 on Win95 (almost)
|
|
Well, i get: loader hostaddr=80 hostmask=f0 portmask=0f delete try 0: ack:0 try 1: ack:0 try 2: ack:0 try 3: ack:0 try 4: ack:0 error deleting program It just occurred to me that i used the pre-built cross-compiler package from Gavin Smyth. I don't (...) (25 years ago, 24-Nov-99, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
| |
| | Re: LegOS 0.2.2 on Win95 (almost)
|
|
(...) the symptom looks a little like the problems i encountered when i tried to compile legOS with gcc-2.95.2 under linux. The message "error deleting program" most likely means, that it was not possible to get in contact with the RCX at all. Could (...) (25 years ago, 24-Nov-99, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
| |
| | LegOS 0.2.2 on Win95 (almost)
|
|
What i did: 0 Follow HOWTO for 0.1.7 (with 0.2.2 archive of course) 1 Add #define O_ASYNC _FASYNC to ...\cygwin-b20\H-i58...ys\fcntl.h (Thanks Luis Villa) 2 - create a subdirectory under legOS\include named lnp, and move lnp.h and lnp-logical.h from (...) (25 years ago, 24-Nov-99, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
| |
| | Re: legOS IR comm and debugging tools
|
|
(...) Yes, do follow this vision. (...) See "info gdb", following the links Targets -> Remote -> Remote Serial. The protocol assumes a serial line, using +/- for acknowledge/nak, single character commands and hexadecimal addresses. There are several (...) (25 years ago, 23-Nov-99, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
| |
| | Version 1.5 - no spirit.ocx - can't use RcxCC
|
|
Teaching with Robolab at the college level, I'd like to use the NCQ environment in class. I'd also like to use the RcxCC "wrapper" since I perceive it to be a little more "user friendly" at their level. Problem is that the new Robolab Version 1.5 (...) (25 years ago, 23-Nov-99, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc)
|
| |
| | V1.5 - no spirit.ocx
|
|
I'd like to use NCQ with my new Robolab challenge set... but the CD with V1.5 I received does not include spirit.ocx. Anyone know how to get this? Couldn't find on Lego's site. Dave -- Dave Crabbe, Faculty Nova Scotia Community College, Canada (...) (25 years ago, 23-Nov-99, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.robolab)
|
| |
| | Spirit.ocx And firmware, Anyone????
|
|
My son has reinstalled his computer and also broken the Mindstorms CD. I've talk to lego sweden but it takes about three to four weeks before we can get a new CD. I've help my son with the programming using NQC. So the only thing I've really need (...) (25 years ago, 23-Nov-99, to lugnet.robotics.rcx)
|
| |
| | Re: NQC wishlist
|
|
(...) Yes, that seems to be the best way to go about it. (...) Don't we all do? :-) (...) Hmm, yes, thata I did not think about... well, we'll continue using macros! ;-) Thanks for the response. And for NQC. /Vlad (25 years ago, 23-Nov-99, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc)
|
| |
| | Re: NQC wishlist
|
|
Dave, All of these additions to NQC sound great ... especially the char and bool data types! There is no way that we (all the NQC users) can adequately express our appreciation for all of your work in developing and freely distributing NQC. I hope (...) (25 years ago, 23-Nov-99, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc)
|
| |
| | Re: NQC wishlist
|
|
(...) I'm not really comfortable with variable-length bit allocations since this isn't something that happens in C outside of structs. But there could still be a couple "smaller" types. Right now an int is 16 bits. Perhaps a char could be 8 bits, (...) (25 years ago, 23-Nov-99, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc)
|
| |
| | Re: legOS IR comm and debugging tools
|
|
(...) Lorenzo, i also just started with legOS and just thought about exactly the same issue. I'm wondering, if anyone has tried to run gdb in remote mode on the RCX. Imho, this would be the perfect solution... I've never ported gdb-remote to a new (...) (25 years ago, 23-Nov-99, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
| |
| | legOS IR comm and debugging tools
|
|
Hello, as I begin to appearch dangerously the 32 variables limit of nqc on a current project, I have started to approach LegOS. After some apparently common problems, I managed to compile the h8300 programs and compile legOS 0.2.2. The demos work as (...) (25 years ago, 22-Nov-99, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
| |
| | first impressions about pbForth
|
|
Hi! After fiddling around with pbForth this weekend, I have to confess I have mixed feelings about it. Maybe not everybody will be thrilled to share them, but maybe I am doing something wrong and I would appreciate the input... The language itself (...) (25 years ago, 22-Nov-99, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.pbforth)
|
| |
| | Re: What should be in the next version of RcxCC
|
|
Hi! well, I am missing something in an otherwise great RcxCC... Variable values display in dec/hex/binary would be great, as converting by hand every time is tedious. thanks /Vlad (25 years ago, 22-Nov-99, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc)
|
| |
| | NQC wishlist
|
|
I am not sure if there is such a wishlist... I remember there was a "call for wishes" for RxCC... The biggest problem with the standard firmware is the small amount of variables. Since not every use of a variable will use all 16 bits, I think it (...) (25 years ago, 22-Nov-99, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc)
|
| |
| | Re: sending files to pbForth - results
|
|
(...) think (...) Also, try the places like www.forth.org or www.taygeta.com (...) com port (...) I'm afraid there is no any good way. Seems this "garbage" appears due to some design problems in IR tower scheme. Usually it happened whenever the (...) (25 years ago, 22-Nov-99, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.pbforth)
|
| |
| | Battery Status ?
|
|
Has anybody figured out the meaning of values got from the BATTERY sensor ? Currently, my little testproggy "cputw(BATTERY>>6);" displays F9, and i guess my batteries are close to their end of life. BTW, if you read this, Markus: The new rotation (...) (25 years ago, 22-Nov-99, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
| |
| | Re: Help - RCX sensor port failure
|
|
(...) I should tell my wife about that ;-) Anyway, in the LEGO supplied software there is a little test window that you can pull out that lets you configure sensors without writting and running programs. You can also see the values that the RCX is (...) (25 years ago, 22-Nov-99, to lugnet.robotics.rcx)
|
