Subject:
|
Re: NQC v. LegOS / size
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.robotics
|
Date:
|
Fri, 12 Feb 1999 15:02:19 GMT
|
Original-From:
|
Luis Villa <liv@duke.[NoSpam]edu>
|
Viewed:
|
1934 times
|
| |
|
|
On Wed, 10 Feb 1999, Rick Kimball wrote:
> It doesn't have to be complex math. I had the same problem
> using the modulo operator. I did a little digging to figure
> out why libgcc.a wasn't compiling properly. It turns
> out that if you add the -Dinhibit_libc to the CFLAGS in the
> top level Makefile of gcc you should end up with a useable
> h8300 libgcc.a.
>
> CFLAGS=-g -O2 -Dinhibit_libc
> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> Edit the makefile and add the define as above. Remake everything
> and you should be all set. Also, add libgcc.a when you link.
> However, I'm doing this from memory so your mileage may vary.
BEAUTIFUL. I spent all of last night trying to figure out a) why make was
calling (and not finding) stdio.h and b) how I could make make realize
that I didn't care about libc. That did the trick... Thanks.
Luis
#######################################################################
"They call the faithful to their knees
to hear the softly spoken magic spell:"
"There's no place like home...
There's no place like home...
There's no place like home."
-Pink Floyd, Dark Side of the Moon
-Dorothy, The Wizard of Oz
#######################################################################
--
Did you check the web site first?: http://www.crynwr.com/lego-robotics
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: NQC v. LegOS / size
|
| (...) It doesn't have to be complex math. I had the same problem using the modulo operator. I did a little digging to figure out why libgcc.a wasn't compiling properly. It turns out that if you add the -Dinhibit_libc to the CFLAGS in the top level (...) (25 years ago, 10-Feb-99, to lugnet.robotics)
|
23 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
