To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.roboticsOpen lugnet.robotics in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Robotics / 18259
18258  |  18260
Subject: 
Re: Dead reckoning (was Re: Rover Programming)
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.robotics
Date: 
Fri, 28 Jun 2002 15:55:43 GMT
Original-From: 
Jona <jjeffords@ameritech.SPAMCAKEnet>
Viewed: 
3101 times
  
Hi Simon,

In my experience casters can introduce errors in the navigation since they
tend to not be in the correct position following a turn. Over time this
small error can add up. I have had some success by rebuilding my bot to
center as much of the weight of the bot over the drive axle, and then using
a skid plate instead of a caster. The centralized weight allows the wheels
to bear the burden, and the skid plate only actually touches the ground for
split seconds at a time when there is a change in momentum.

If you find you are still having some problems with your current setup, you
may consider losing the casters.

Jona

----- Original Message -----
From: "Simon Brooke" <simon@jasmine.org.uk>
To: <sjbaker1@airmail.net>; <lego-robotics@crynwr.com>
Sent: Friday, June 28, 2002 4:30 AM
Subject: Re: Dead reckoning (was Re: Rover Programming)


> On Friday 28 Jun 2002 8:27 am, you wrote:
> > Simon Brooke wrote:
> > > So I'm now looking at software solutions that reduce inertia - i.e.
> > > gradually ramping up and down speed in turns. We'll see how this
> > > goes.
> > 
> > Yes - managing accelleration is a 'must'...both in speeding up and
> > slowing down - and easing into turns.  An abrupt change of speed will
> > generally result in wheel slip.
> 
> Well, I did the code changes to do acceleration and deceleration
> yesterday and it's amazingly successful. I'm not yet quite as good as
> the Seattle robot, but I suspect that's at least partly because mine
> has a narrower track. I now believe that, with tweaks to the robot and
> the code, I can get down to 1% error.
> 
> I'm *very* encouraged.
> 
> > The two-large-wheels-plus-caster(s) seems to be the undesputed best
> > design for navigation (at least with Lego parts).
> 
> Oh, well, I'm currently using two large wheels plus two casters, so I'm
> probably OK.
> 
> Cheers
> 
> Simon
> 
> --
> simon@jasmine.org.uk (Simon Brooke) http://www.jasmine.org.uk/~simon/
> 
> ;; when in the shit, the wise man plants courgettes



Message is in Reply To:
  Re: Dead reckoning (was Re: Rover Programming)
 
(...) Well, I did the code changes to do acceleration and deceleration yesterday and it's amazingly successful. I'm not yet quite as good as the Seattle robot, but I suspect that's at least partly because mine has a narrower track. I now believe (...) (24 years ago, 28-Jun-02, to lugnet.robotics)

24 Messages in This Thread:








Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR