To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.roboticsOpen lugnet.robotics in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Robotics / 18247
18246  |  18248
Subject: 
Re: Dead reckoning (was Re: Rover Programming)
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.robotics
Date: 
Thu, 27 Jun 2002 16:41:34 GMT
Viewed: 
2906 times
  
> It's killing me. My first rotation sensor robots were inaccurate, so I
> started again with a new design with the rotation sensors on idler
> wheels rather than on the driven wheels. That was more inaccurate. So
> I've gone back to having the rotation sensors geared off the driven
> wheels, and I've at last achieved a robot which can (on a polished
> wooden floor) walk a one metre square and return to within 10cm of it's
> starting position. Wow! Achievement! However, like my first attempts,
> it turns more than the calculated amount on polished floors (presumably
> the inertia of the turn causes slip) and less than the calculated
> amount on carpet (presumably because of drag).
> 
> So I'm now looking at software solutions that reduce inertia - i.e.
> gradually ramping up and down speed in turns. We'll see how this goes.
> 
> I'm currently using the 8.5 centimetre wheels on my dead reckoning bot.
> Has anyone tried building a dead reckoning bot with tracks? How did it
> perform?

If you haven't already, check out

http://www.seattlerobotics.org/encoder/200108/using_a_pid.html

He was able to get quite precise dead-reckoning w/ a Lego bot by programming a
PID-type controller.

- Gareth



Message has 1 Reply:
  Re: Dead reckoning (was Re: Rover Programming)
 
(...) WOW! That's impressive - but I can't help but get the impression that it's heavily optimised to going around that particular track. Getting that good positioning on the straight sections is impressive - but I wonder how it would have fared in (...) (24 years ago, 28-Jun-02, to lugnet.robotics)

Message is in Reply To:
  Dead reckoning (was Re: Rover Programming)
 
(...) A systematic search pattern is one solution. Not being too anal about it is another - random walking the domain will eventually explore the whole of it, although increasingly inefficiently as time goes on. (...) It's killing me. My first (...) (24 years ago, 27-Jun-02, to lugnet.robotics)

24 Messages in This Thread:








Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR