To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.roboticsOpen lugnet.robotics in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Robotics / 18257
18256  |  18258
Subject: 
Re: Dead reckoning (was Re: Rover Programming)
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.robotics
Date: 
Fri, 28 Jun 2002 07:31:07 GMT
Original-From: 
Steve Baker <sjbaker1@airmail.net^spamcake^>
Reply-To: 
sjbaker1@!Spamcake!airmail.net
Viewed: 
1001 times
  
Gareth Bestor wrote:

If you haven't already, check out

http://www.seattlerobotics.org/encoder/200108/using_a_pid.html

He was able to get quite precise dead-reckoning w/ a Lego bot by programming a
PID-type controller.

WOW! That's impressive - but I can't help but get the impression that it's heavily
optimised to going around that particular track.  Getting that good positioning
on the straight sections is impressive - but I wonder how it would have
fared in a slalom or any more general task.

----------------------------- Steve Baker -------------------------------
Mail : <sjbaker1@airmail.net>   WorkMail: <sjbaker@link.com>
URLs : http://www.sjbaker.org
        http://plib.sf.net http://tuxaqfh.sf.net http://tuxkart.sf.net
        http://prettypoly.sf.net http://freeglut.sf.net
        http://toobular.sf.net   http://lodestone.sf.net



Message is in Reply To:
  Re: Dead reckoning (was Re: Rover Programming)
 
(...) If you haven't already, check out (URL) was able to get quite precise dead-reckoning w/ a Lego bot by programming a PID-type controller. - Gareth (22 years ago, 27-Jun-02, to lugnet.robotics)

24 Messages in This Thread:








Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    
Active threads in Robotics

 
Verified and Trusted Team of Hackers
10 hours ago
Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR