Subject:
|
RE: Rover Programming
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.robotics
|
Date:
|
Wed, 26 Jun 2002 13:56:04 GMT
|
Reply-To:
|
<RHEMPEL@BMTS.spamcakeCOM>
|
Viewed:
|
870 times
|
| |
|
|
I just wrote:
> This definitely is worth expoling some more.
I meant to write:
> This definitely is worth exploring some more.
I'm just making sure that nobody thinks expoling
is an actual word. And if it was, I wonder what it
would mean?
Cheers, Ralph
|
|
Message has 2 Replies:
 | | Re: Rover Programming
|
| (...) It's the opposite of impoling. ---...--- Steve Baker ---...--- Mail : <sjbaker1@airmail.net> WorkMail: <sjbaker@link.com> URLs : (8 URLs) (22 years ago, 27-Jun-02, to lugnet.robotics)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | RE: Rover Programming
|
| Steve Baker Wrote: (...) I'm going to add a proviso here - when you hit something that you shouldn't have hit! Anyways, this is a very interesting idea, Steve. The bitmap analysis is fine. I don't think any of us with kids and a reasonably large (...) (22 years ago, 26-Jun-02, to lugnet.robotics)
|
24 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
Active threads in Robotics
|
|
|
|
|
|
