To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.roboticsOpen lugnet.robotics in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Robotics / *33513 (-20)
  Re: Navigation using landmarks (Was: Re: lasers and RCX)
 
(...) tiny (...) suitable (...) What a good idea. Does anyone know how they work and where to get the chips? Peter (23 years ago, 29-Jun-02, to lugnet.robotics)
 
  Re: Light Sensor Problem
 
I had similar problems, so I added a bit of code to display the light sensor value on the LCD. I then placed the bot on the test pad and observed the various numbers as it crossed from white to green and black. I then updated the linetrack.c with (...) (23 years ago, 29-Jun-02, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
 
  Re: Control a microScout
 
Hi Juan!, It's good to see another venezuelan in this group. I thought I was alone... Steve Baker gave you a very good explanation. I think however that you could check (URL) you're already into NQC you can use this lib to send commands to the (...) (23 years ago, 28-Jun-02, to lugnet.robotics)
 
  Re: Dead reckoning (was Re: Rover Programming)
 
Hi Simon, In my experience casters can introduce errors in the navigation since they tend to not be in the correct position following a turn. Over time this small error can add up. I have had some success by rebuilding my bot to center as much of (...) (23 years ago, 28-Jun-02, to lugnet.robotics)
 
  Linux driver for USB tower
 
Hi, I have a working linux driver for the lego USB tower; so far it has only been tested on kernel 2.4.14 on a uhci system, where it has worked without any problems. Anyone feel like testing it out on their own system (to use it, you will need to be (...) (23 years ago, 28-Jun-02, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc, lugnet.robotics.rcx.pbforth)
 
  Re: Dead reckoning (was Re: Rover Programming)
 
(...) Well, I did the code changes to do acceleration and deceleration yesterday and it's amazingly successful. I'm not yet quite as good as the Seattle robot, but I suspect that's at least partly because mine has a narrower track. I now believe (...) (23 years ago, 28-Jun-02, to lugnet.robotics)
 
  Re: Dead reckoning (was Re: Rover Programming)
 
(...) WOW! That's impressive - but I can't help but get the impression that it's heavily optimised to going around that particular track. Getting that good positioning on the straight sections is impressive - but I wonder how it would have fared in (...) (23 years ago, 28-Jun-02, to lugnet.robotics)
 
  Re: Dead reckoning (was Re: Rover Programming)
 
(...) Yes - managing accelleration is a 'must'...both in speeding up and slowing down - and easing into turns. An abrupt change of speed will generally result in wheel slip. (...) It was good in a straight line - but *hopeless* in a turn because the (...) (23 years ago, 28-Jun-02, to lugnet.robotics)
 
  Re: Rover Programming
 
(...) Yes - and it's very fast to implement. Better still, you can use one of several rectangle encoding tricks that are out there (kind of like two-dimensional run-length encoding). Those are typically able to compress at the square of the ratio of (...) (23 years ago, 28-Jun-02, to lugnet.robotics)
 
  Re: Control a microScout
 
(...) Well, the RIS 2.0 tower can drive the microscout - but not the RIS 1.5 tower. The microscout uses something called 'VLL' (Visible Light Link) - which is kinda like the IR commands that you send to your RCX - but they are sent in the visible (...) (23 years ago, 28-Jun-02, to lugnet.robotics)
 
  Re: Navigation using landmarks (Was: Re: lasers and RCX)
 
(...) I meant the error due to things like refraction around solid objects, reflections, etc. Also - I didn't mean estimating and correcting for it at runtime - I just wanted an idea of what sort of magnitude of error those effects presented. (...) (...) (23 years ago, 28-Jun-02, to lugnet.robotics)
 
  Re: Navigation using landmarks (Was: Re: lasers and RCX)
 
Steve (...) and (...) If it were me, I'd program a PIC chip to do everything and then deliver the results to the RCX. But I'm not a Lego purist. (...) Tradition had it that with three radio beacons and three hyperbolae you'd get three lines (...) (23 years ago, 27-Jun-02, to lugnet.robotics)
 
  Re: Rover Programming
 
(...) needs (...) uncompressing (...) Run-Length-Encoding (RLE) should work well on a blobby black-and-white map. Or you could store line N as the difference (or XOR) between line N and line (N-1). The difference would be mostly zero. Then RLE it. (...) (23 years ago, 27-Jun-02, to lugnet.robotics)
 
  Re: Rover Programming
 
<snip> (...) </snip> I hear dogs do a lot of that also... ;) -Rob (23 years ago, 27-Jun-02, to lugnet.robotics)
 
  Re: Rover Programming
 
I've been thinking a bit about using landmarks imitating ants. You should know that ants use different types of self-produced chemicals to mark the places they have been and the paths to follow. Using this with robots would mean using a light sensor (...) (23 years ago, 27-Jun-02, to lugnet.robotics)
 
  Control a microScout
 
Greetings from Venezuela!!! How can I use a MicroScout as a third motor on my RCX, I own a RIS 1.5 and a DDK or Can I control the MicroScout from the IR Tower? Thanks!! Juan (23 years ago, 27-Jun-02, to lugnet.robotics)
 
  Re: Dead reckoning (was Re: Rover Programming)
 
(...) If you haven't already, check out (URL) was able to get quite precise dead-reckoning w/ a Lego bot by programming a PID-type controller. - Gareth (23 years ago, 27-Jun-02, to lugnet.robotics)
 
  Re: control multiple mindstorms robots using 1 IR tower!
 
(...) found it! BattleBricks at (URL) the "Remote Control" link under "Support" on the sidebar on the left. (23 years ago, 27-Jun-02, to lugnet.robotics.rcx)
 
  Re: pbForth vs RCX 1.0
 
Thanks, Just to make sure, let's take an example. Let's say that I have two RCX, named A and B. What if the program in RCX B is waiting for a character on the instruction KEY and RCX A sends a character, let's say '5' (ASCII 52) with 52 EMIT ? That (...) (23 years ago, 27-Jun-02, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.pbforth)
 
  kits on sale - Toronto area
 
I was recently at the Cookstown factory outlet (located at highway 400 and 89, north of Toronto) which has a LEGO outlet store. The store currently has Vision Command on sale for $52.99 Can (regular price $149.99) and Exploration Mars $49.99 Can (...) (23 years ago, 27-Jun-02, to lugnet.robotics)


Next Page:  5 more | 10 more | 20 more

Redisplay Messages:  All | Compact

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR