 | | Re: GATS layout suggestions
|
|
(...) Now that I think about it, I think it was 14 high with wheels AND track. The Superliner is a double-decker train, remember--even though I used the lowboy plates, I think it's 11 bricks and a plate on top of the low part of the plate. Peter (25 years ago, 2-Jul-01, to lugnet.org.us.michlug)
|
| |
| | (canceled)
|
|
|
| |
| | Re: Track Designer help, please
|
|
Amy & All, (...) "Oh, your one of those people" - The 6th Day, evil corporate guy talking to Arnold ; ) Mac's are fine, not my preference. (...) Well, I do a screen capture (using print screen button, and pasting it into Paint, or the Mac (...) (25 years ago, 1-Jul-01, to lugnet.org.us.michlug)
|
| |
| | (canceled)
|
|
|
| |
| | Re: GATS layout suggestions
|
|
(...) Wow 14 high that's tall! With them sitting on the track that will be a tight fit!I thought by going with 16 it wouldn't even come close to being a problem. (25 years ago, 1-Jul-01, to lugnet.org.us.michlug)
|
| |
| | More medieval village
|
|
Just to get people's interest up for the benefit event, and to show some things I've been talking about, I've posted a few pics of my newest medieval stuff to Brickshelf. Quality is terrible because I used the only camera available to me, the Lego (...) (25 years ago, 1-Jul-01, to lugnet.org.us.michlug)
|
| |
| | Re: GATS layout suggestions
|
|
(...) 16 bricks? Shoot, this could be a little tight for my Amtrak Superliner... Not to mention the dinosaur transport car. I think both of those end up being 14 high (counting wheels) so we should be OK, if people even want to run these... Peter (25 years ago, 1-Jul-01, to lugnet.org.us.michlug)
|
| |
| | Re: Building priorities (was Re: U.S.S. Grand Rapids for the GATS)
|
|
(...) I don't think we'd have a real problem with a policy like this. If you look at out January display, we filled--what was it, 18x24?--a layout and had very few stock buildings. Lots of stock cars and train parts, but really not that many stock (...) (25 years ago, 1-Jul-01, to lugnet.org.us.michlug)
|
| |
| | Re: GATS layout suggestions
|
|
(...) Amy I moved the road over.I had a enough room between big red and your white building to slide things to the left. (...) Ok i moved the monorail.Keep in mind the track(mono) sits on 16 bricks then the track itself(to keep clear for the RR (...) (25 years ago, 1-Jul-01, to lugnet.org.us.michlug)
|
| |
| | Re: Building priorities (was Re: U.S.S. Grand Rapids for the GATS)
|
|
Frank, (...) Well, you don't really know the situation, and some other items involved with this, but anyway... (...) That is not the policy, nor were we thinking about it in that regards. Fair enough? Scott S. -- (25 years ago, 1-Jul-01, to lugnet.org.us.michlug)
|
| |
| | Re: Building priorities (was Re: U.S.S. Grand Rapids for the GATS)
|
|
Larry, Well, it looks like I misread your posts, Larry, but I did reread yours a number of times, and if I read them wrong, I apologize. (...) That's fine. Bring that you want in the space you have. (...) I have gone too far. All right. Well, Larry, (...) (25 years ago, 1-Jul-01, to lugnet.org.us.michlug)
|
| |
| | (canceled)
|
|
|
| |
| | Re: U.S.S. Grand Rapids for the GATS
|
|
(...) You can even get a black zodiak now... Frank (25 years ago, 1-Jul-01, to lugnet.org.us.michlug)
|
| |
| | Re: Building priorities (was Re: U.S.S. Grand Rapids for the GATS)
|
|
(...) for (...) Feel free to ignore the following advice from an outsider... I reccomend against a policy which requires everything to be home brew. If that had been the rule in our recent show in Raleigh, I would have had just a handfull of things (...) (25 years ago, 1-Jul-01, to lugnet.org.us.michlug)
|
| |
| | Re: Building priorities (was Re: U.S.S. Grand Rapids for the GATS)
|
|
(...) This sarcasm on your part is totally uncalled for. Reread what I said, and don't twist my words around, please. (...) This sarcasm is beneath you, Scott. Again, reread what I said and don't twist my words around please. All I ever said was (...) (25 years ago, 1-Jul-01, to lugnet.org.us.michlug)
|
| |
| | Re: Building priorities (was Re: U.S.S. Grand Rapids for the GATS)
|
|
(...) Neither, exactly... just that given the time remaining and my own time budget per week (not very large) mediocre is the best I can do in a short span. (...) ++Lar (25 years ago, 1-Jul-01, to lugnet.org.us.michlug)
|
| |
| | (canceled)
|
|
|
| |
| | Re: Building priorities (was Re: U.S.S. Grand Rapids for the GATS)
|
|
Larry, I wrote about three different responses to you about this, and I really don't feel like posting anymore about it. Do whatever you want with the space you have, if we have more space, I am sure you will get more, and I hope whatever you bring (...) (25 years ago, 1-Jul-01, to lugnet.org.us.michlug)
|
| |
| | Re: Building priorities (was Re: U.S.S. Grand Rapids for the GATS)
|
|
(...) If that is how you want to do it that's fine.That school would look good by my houses. (...) Umm are you saying you only build mediore buildings or just mediocre compared to someone like Kevin W. ?(of course most of us IMO build mediocre (...) (25 years ago, 1-Jul-01, to lugnet.org.us.michlug)
|
| |
| | Re: Building priorities (was Re: U.S.S. Grand Rapids for the GATS)
|
|
(...) You're correct. That concept is wrong, because it's not what I am saying. My goal for the very small portion of the total I was given is to make the best structural display I am capable of making. That's it. The entire rest of the layout can (...) (25 years ago, 1-Jul-01, to lugnet.org.us.michlug)
|
