 | | Re: 3T cube orientation
|
|
(...) Yes. hopefully, somebody will believe me at some point ;-). (...) Absolutely. To be fair, Matt has far more processing power than the RCX, extremely well-tested firmware, and a multi-year head start. (...) No, put it's one of the things I like (...) (19 years ago, 14-Dec-05, to lugnet.org.us.laflrc)
|
| |
| | Re: 3T cube orientation
|
|
(...) You keep saying that. I've taught Matt to play Tic-Tac-Toe. I think he's doing better than you, at this point. (...) I think that shouldn't need saying. (...) I think it's up to the builder how/if it signals the game is over. It would be cool (...) (19 years ago, 14-Dec-05, to lugnet.org.us.laflrc)
|
| |
| | Re: 3T cube orientation
|
|
Steve Hassenplug forwarded: (...) I'd agree with Steve - anything other then "bottoms up" should be OK. (...) Well then you're doing better than me at this point. Stupid grading... stupid stomach flu... stupid requirement of actually having a (...) (19 years ago, 14-Dec-05, to lugnet.org.us.laflrc)
|
| |
| | Re: 3T cube orientation
|
|
(...) I'd say NO. The cube can be oriented any way EXCEPT upside-down. Anyone else? Steve (19 years ago, 14-Dec-05, to lugnet.org.us.laflrc)
|
| |
| | Re: 3T board & rules
|
|
(...) Wow. My compliments to the marketing department, that was a nice fast update. Now if I can just get my 2-year-old to stop powering all the motors at random... hmm, maybe that's a strategy... (19 years ago, 13-Dec-05, to lugnet.org.us.laflrc)
|
| |
| | Re: 3T board & rules
|
|
(...) (URL) (19 years ago, 13-Dec-05, to lugnet.org.us.laflrc)
|
| |
| | Re: 3T board & rules
|
|
(...) Sounds great. I'll paste this text into the page, link to the picture and post it soon. (if that's OK) Steve (19 years ago, 13-Dec-05, to lugnet.org.us.laflrc)
|
| |
| | Re: 3T board & rules
|
|
(...) snip (...) how about a deeper link, so we do not have to wait for post moderation? ;) Chris (19 years ago, 13-Dec-05, to lugnet.org.us.laflrc)
|
| |
| | 3T board & rules
|
|
Ok, Try this out for a 3T board & robot diagram. (URL) for the explanation... Zone 1: White player has complete & total control at ALL TIMES of this area. Black player may NEVER enter this area. Zone 2: Black player has complete & total control at (...) (19 years ago, 13-Dec-05, to lugnet.org.us.laflrc)
|
| |
| | Re: 3T
|
|
(...) For the time being, I'm sticking with Mindscript. Steve gave me a couple of ideas on combining & re-using some code so I didn't have quite so many if statements to nest. I had already spend significant time writing Mindscript code, so I (...) (19 years ago, 12-Dec-05, to lugnet.org.us.laflrc)
|
| |
| | Re: 3T
|
|
(...) Maybe you could generate an image of the top-view, and overlay the zones... (...) Each builder would be allowed to build four plates high in the four stud neutral zone on their [right] side. Correct? (...) Yes. I wanted to post that. And, I (...) (19 years ago, 12-Dec-05, to lugnet.org.us.laflrc)
|
| |
| | Re: 3T
|
|
(...) Agreed on both points - thanks for doing the graphics, John. (...) What if two robots both want to make "permanent connections" to the same areas of the neutral space, and they go head-to-head? I'm not sure I see how anything other than a flat (...) (19 years ago, 12-Dec-05, to lugnet.org.us.laflrc)
|
| |
| | Re: 3T
|
|
(...) side, not in front/back. (...) Right. (...) Very cool. It sounds like you're ahead of the rest of us. Steve (19 years ago, 12-Dec-05, to lugnet.org.us.laflrc)
|
| |
| | Re: 3T
|
|
This weekend we discussed adding the additional 4-studs of clearance to the side, the back, and/or both. Which is it? For my purely selfish reasons, I'd like no additional clearance requirements on the back (my side of the board) but the side would (...) (19 years ago, 12-Dec-05, to lugnet.org.us.laflrc)
|
| |
| | Re: 3T
|
|
(...) Ok, if that works for Bryan and the rest. Of course, after you posted... (...) ...you *know* that I'm going to try to minimize the footprint as much as possible. Sigh... I'm already keeping it to a single RCX. Sure, what's another constraint (...) (19 years ago, 12-Dec-05, to lugnet.org.us.laflrc)
|
| |
| | Re: 3T
|
|
(...) Eight studs from the last cube should be ok. Right now, the board already has four, so another four would be all right. I have mine built within the four stud area, but I know some of you guys will need the extra space. (...) I'll talk with (...) (19 years ago, 11-Dec-05, to lugnet.org.us.laflrc)
|
| |
| | Re: 3T
|
|
In lugnet.org.us.laflrc, Bryan wrote (through Steve Hassenplug): (...) I've been assuming that everything outside the 27x27 area on the opponent side ("top") and the left side are OOB. I'm willing to relax that, as it makes some things very tricky (...) (19 years ago, 11-Dec-05, to lugnet.org.us.laflrc)
|
| |
| | Re: 3T
|
|
(...) well then, instead of light, why not use touch? its only a 3x3 board. you know were you put your blocks, do what I did for project X, and what Steve copied for C$. Press until your at a point you know there is or is not a block. When it comes (...) (19 years ago, 8-Dec-05, to lugnet.org.us.laflrc)
|
| |
| | Re: 3T
|
|
(...) Yeah, that would probably make it work. Only a couple problems with it. (1) I don't have a lego light (big problem) (2) if I had a lego light, I'd have to get power out on the 35+ stud long arm that moves in and out over the playing board (...) (19 years ago, 8-Dec-05, to lugnet.org.us.laflrc)
|
| |
| | Re: 3T
|
|
(...) John, Do me a quick favor, quickly mount a lego light right on top of your light sensor and "aim" it at your blocks. You might find that solves your problem. Chris (19 years ago, 7-Dec-05, to lugnet.org.us.laflrc)
|
